Use of a SNP panel to refine risk estimates in women at high risk of breast cancer: Results from two randomized tamoxifen prevention trials.

Authors

null

Jack M. Cuzick

Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, London, United Kingdom

Jack M. Cuzick , Adam Brentnall , Corrinne Segal , Ivana Sestak , Roseann Kealy , Anthony Howell , Trevor J. Powles , Nicholas Orr , William G. Newman , Mitchell Dowsett

Organizations

Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, London, United Kingdom, Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom, Queen Mary, University of London, London, United Kingdom, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom, Parkside Oncology Clinic, London, United Kingdom, St Mary's Hospital, Genetic Medicine, Manchester, United Kingdom, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom

Research Funding

Other

Background: An assessment of how panels of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) breast cancer risk factors might improve risk assessment among high-risk women is needed for better targeting of preventive therapy and other risk reduction measures. Methods: A case-control study was designed using leukocytic or tissue DNA from two tamoxifen prevention trials (IBIS-I and Marsden). SNPs were assayed on the Sequenom platform and a relative risk score for 15 SNPs (SNP15) was formed using the most recent iCOGS SNP risk estimates. Baseline questionnaires were used to estimate 10-year relative risks from the Tyrer-Cuzick model (TC). Conditional logistic regression was used to assess performance. An updated panel using all validated risk SNPs (approx. 70) is also being evaluated and will be presented at the meeting. Results: 440 cases and 686 controls had median age at baseline of 49 (inter-quartile range 45 - 54). Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was verified. SNP15 and TC appeared uncorrelated (Spearman 0.037, P=0.209). The odds ratio (OR) between 25th, 75th percentiles of SNP15 was 1.24 (95% CI 1.05 - 1.46) with AUC 0.568; TC had OR 1.41 (1.21 - 1.64), AUC 0.578; combined OR 1.54 (1.30 - 1.83), AUC 0.600. The observed risk was 48% (11 – 84) of predicted for SNP15 and 77% (42 – 110) for TC. SNP15 was more predictive for estrogen receptor (ER) positive tumours (318 cases, OR 1.36 (1.12 – 1.64), AUC 0.587, 67% (25-109) of predicted) but not for estrogen-receptor (ER) negative cancer (122 cases, P = 0.76); TC was significantly associated with both ER types. Little difference in performance was seen between tamoxifen and placebo treatment arms. The proportion of untreated women with 10-yr predicted risk above 8% was <1% for SNP15, 18% for TC and 25% for the combined risk score. Conclusions: A SNP panel is useful for refining risk estimates in women with phenotypic risk factors for breast cancer, and adds important information to classic phenotypic factors but does not appear to vary according to potential to benefit from tamoxifen. Clinical trial information: ISRCTN91879928 (ref: CCT-NAPN-14839).

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Highlights Session

Session Title

Cancer Prevention/Epidemiology

Track

Cancer Prevention/Epidemiology

Sub Track

Cancer Genetics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

ISRCTN91879928 (ref: CCT-NAPN-14839)

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr 1519)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.1519

Abstract #

1519

Poster Bd #

8

Abstract Disclosures