Phase 3 trial results for rolapitant, a novel NK-1 receptor antagonist, in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in subjects receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC).

Authors

Bernardo Rapoport

Bernardo Leon Rapoport

The Medical Oncology Center of Rosebank, Johannesburg, South Africa

Bernardo Leon Rapoport , Allen Poma , Mary Lynne Hedley , Robert E. Martell , Rudolph M. Navari

Organizations

The Medical Oncology Center of Rosebank, Johannesburg, South Africa, TESARO, Inc., Waltham, MA, Division of Hematology Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, Indiana University School of Medicine South Bend, South Bend, IN

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Rolapitant is a highly selective competitive long acting NK-1 receptor antagonist that demonstrated efficacy and safety in a large randomized phase 2 dose-finding study. This study evaluated the 200 mg dose for efficacy and safety in the prevention of CINV in subjects receiving HEC. Methods: Randomized phase 3 double-blind active-control study. 555 cisplatin-naïve subjects treated with HEC (≥60 mg/m2 cisplatin) were randomized 1:1 to receive either (1) rolapitant + granisetron + dexamethasone or (2) placebo + granisetron + dexamethasone. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR=no emesis and no rescue medication) in the delayed phase (>24-120 hrs) post-chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints included CR during the acute (0-24 hrs) and overall (0-120 hrs) phases. Treatment comparisons were performed using a Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test; to control for the type1 error, testing for the key secondary endpoints was conducted in a stepwise fashion. Subjects recorded episodes of emesis, nausea and rescue medication using a subject diary during 0-120 hours post-chemotherapy. Results: There were 544 evaluable subjects. Subjects in the rolapitant group had a significantly higher CR rate for the primary study endpoint during the delayed phase (70.1% vs 61.9%, p=0.043) compared to control. CR rates were also higher in rolapitant group for acute and overall phases (83.4% vs 79.5%, p=0.233; 67.5% vs 60.4%, p=0.084, respectively). The rolapitant group achieved higher rates of no nausea (maximum Visual Analog scale <5mm, 0-100mm) in both the delayed and overall phases compared to control (58.3% vs 46.9%, p=0.007; 55.0% vs 44.0%, p=0.009, respectively). AE rates were similar across both groups. Conclusions: Rolapitant in combination with a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone was well-tolerated and demonstrated superior efficacy over control in the primary endpoint of the prevention of delayed CINV in subjects receiving HEC in a global phase 3 study. Clinical trial information: NCT01500213.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Patient and Survivor Care

Track

Patient and Survivor Care

Sub Track

Palliative Care and Symptom Management

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01500213

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr 9638)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.9638

Abstract #

9638

Poster Bd #

288

Abstract Disclosures