BRCA1/BRCA2 (BRCA) testing in young women with breast cancer: Patterns, motivations, and implications for treatment decisions.

Authors

null

Shoshana M. Rosenberg

Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA

Shoshana M. Rosenberg , Kathryn Jean Ruddy , Rulla M. Tamimi , Shari I. Gelber , Lidia Schapira , Steven E. Come , Virginia F. Borges , Bryce G. Larsen , Judy Ellen Garber , Ann H. Partridge

Organizations

Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: While BRCA testing is recommended for women diagnosed with breast cancer before age 50, little is known about decisions surrounding testing in young patients. Methods: As part of an ongoing cohort study, we surveyed 765 women diagnosed with breast cancer at age ≤ 40 about their experience with BRCA testing at approximately 1 year after diagnosis. We used Chi-square tests to evaluate differences in how genetic information was used to make treatment decisions among women who 1) tested positive 2) tested negative 3) were not tested. Among untested women, we assessed whether 1) genetic risk was discussed with a provider 2) reasons why they were not tested. Results: 655/765 (86%) of women reported undergoing BRCA testing by 1 year from diagnosis. 31% (232/746) said that knowledge/concern about genetic risk influenced treatment decisions. Among these women (Table), 87% of mutation carriers, 50% of non-carriers, and 45% of untested women chose bilateral mastectomy; fewer women reported that adjuvant treatment decisions were influenced by genetic risk concern. Among untested women, 32% (35/110) had not discussed the possibility that they might have a mutation with their doctor. The top 5 reasons cited for not testing were: patient perceived risk low (25%), doctor perceived risk low (24%), not a priority (18%), insurance/work (14%), financial (11%). 39% were thinking of testing in the future. Conclusions: >10% of women with breast cancer ≤ 40 were not tested for a BRCA mutation within a year of diagnosis. Among these women, 1/3 did not discuss genetic risk with their doctor. Given that knowledge/concern about genetic risk influences surgical decisions and can affect systemic therapy trial eligibility, all young breast cancer patients should have access to adequate genetic counseling and testing if desired.

Genetic concerns influenced use/choice of treatment in the following ways.
(N=232) BRCA+
N=71
N (%)
BRCA-
N=139
N (%)
Not tested
N=22
N (%)
p
Mastectomy instead of lumpectomy 3 (4) 14 (10) 7 (32) 0.001
Bilateral mastectomy 62 (87) 70 (50) 10 (45) <0.0001
Salpingo-Oophorectomies 37 (52) 6 (4) 2 (9) <0.0001
Endocrine therapy 12 (17) 28 (20) 4 (18) 0.78 
Chemotherapy 14 (20) 17 (12) 3 (14) 0.35 

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Health Services Research

Track

Health Services Research

Sub Track

Access to Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr 6548)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.6548

Abstract #

6548

Poster Bd #

11

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts