Phase 3 trial results for rolapitant, a novel NK-1 receptor antagonist, in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in subjects receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC).

Authors

null

Ian D. Schnadig

Compass Oncology and The US Oncology Network, Portland, OR

Ian D. Schnadig , Manuel R. Modiano , Allen Poma , Mary Lynne Hedley , Robert E. Martell , Lee Steven Schwartzberg

Organizations

Compass Oncology and The US Oncology Network, Portland, OR, Arizona Clinical Research Center, Tucson, AZ, TESARO, Inc., Waltham, MA, Division of Hematology Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Rolapitant is a highly selective competitive long acting NK-1 receptor antagonist that demonstrated efficacy in a large randomized phase 2 dose-finding study. This study evaluated the 200 mg dose for efficacy and safety in the prevention of CINV in subjects receiving MEC. Methods: Randomized phase 3 double-blind active-control study. 1,369 chemo-naïve patients treated with MEC (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, epirubicin, carboplatin, irinotecan, daunorubicin or cytarabine) were randomized 1:1 to either (1) rolapitant + granisetron + dexamethasone or (2) placebo + granisetron + dexamethasone. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR=no emesis and no rescue medication) in delayed phase (>24-120 hrs) post-chemo. Secondary endpoints included CR in acute (0-24 hrs) and overall (0-120 hrs) phases. Treatment comparisons were performed using Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test; to control for type 1 error testing for key secondary endpoints was conducted in a stepwise fashion. Subjects recorded episodes of emesis, nausea and rescue medication using a diary during 0-120 hrs post-chemo. Results: There were 1,344 evaluable patients (>50% received anthracycline-cyclophosphamide therapy). Subjects in rolapitant group had a significantly higher CR rate for the primary study endpoint during delayed phase compared to control (71.3% vs 61.6%, p<0.001, respectively). CR rates were also higher in rolapitant group for acute and overall phases (83.5% vs 80.3%, p=0.143; 68.6% vs 57.8%, p<0.001, respectively). The rolapitant group achieved higher rates of complete protection (no emesis, no rescue medication and maximum nausea VAS <25mm) in both delayed and overall phases compared to control (64.3% vs 56.9%, p=0.006; 62.0% vs 53.2%, p=0.001, respectively). AE rates were similar across both groups. Conclusions: Rolapitant in combination with a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone was well-tolerated and demonstrated superior efficacy over control in the primary endpoint of the prevention of delayed CINV in subjects receiving MEC in a global phase 3 study. Clinical trial information: NCT01500226.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Patient and Survivor Care

Track

Patient and Survivor Care

Sub Track

Palliative Care and Symptom Management

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01500226

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr 9633)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.9633

Abstract #

9633

Poster Bd #

283

Abstract Disclosures