A multicenter, open-label, phase 3 trial to compare the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib (E7080) versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of subjects with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors

null

Richard S. Finn

Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA

Richard S. Finn , Ann-Lii Cheng , Kenji Ikeda , Masatoshi Kudo , Toshiyuki Tamai , Corina E. Dutcus , Steven Younger , Kwang-Hyub Han , Shukui Qin , Eric Raymond

Organizations

Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kinki University School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan, Eisai, Tokyo, Japan, Eisai, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea, PLA Cancer Center of Nanjing Bayi Hospital, Nanjing, China, Hopital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Lenvatinib (L, E7080) is an oral multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFR1-3, FGFR1-4, PDGFRβ, RET and KIT. Given the role of angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a phase 1/2 open-label study evaluated the safety and efficacy of L in 46 patients with advanced disease and Childs-Pugh (CP) A liver function status (Kudo ILCA 2013). Patients were treated with a starting dose of L 12 mg qd (28-d cycles) until disease progression or development of unmanageable toxicities. Median time to progression (TTP) was 12.8 months (mo; 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.23–14.7) and median overall survival (OS) was 18.7 mo (95% CI 12.8–25.1). The most common adverse events were hypertension 76% (Gr3 54%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome 61% (Gr3 7%), proteinuria 59% (Gr3 20%), anorexia 57% (Gr3 2%), thrombocytopenia 50% (Gr3 33%), and fatigue 48% (Gr3 0%). Overall response rate (ORR) was 37%; 45.7% had stable disease. Methods: Based on these phase 2 data, a global, randomized, open-label phase 3 trial was designed to determine if L is non-inferior or superior compared to sorafenib (S) in advanced HCC. Eligible patients (N=940) with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage B or C HCC, CP A status, and ECOG 0-1 will be randomized 1:1 to either L 12 mg or 8 mg orally qd (based on body weight [BW]) or S 400 mg orally bid. Patients will be stratified by region; macroscopic portal vein invasion, extrahepatic spread, or both; ECOG-PS; and BW (<60 vs ≥60 kg). The primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, TTP, ORR (modified RECIST criteria), safety and PK/PD. Given an estimated median OS for S of approximately 10 mo, a 2.5 mo improvement was derived to achieve a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.8. Statistical study power (using a non-inferiority test by the 95% CI lower-limit method on log HR for OS) was determined based on this HR and a non-inferiority margin of 1.08, corresponding to 60% retention of S effect vs placebo. Based on these assumptions, the study power to declare non-inferiority or superiority is approximately 97% and 82%, respectively. The overall false positive rate is 0.05 (2-sided). Clinical trial information: NCT01761266.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Hepatobiliary Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01761266

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr TPS4153)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.tps4153

Abstract #

TPS4153

Poster Bd #

235B

Abstract Disclosures