Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
Jeffrey Howard Lipton , Charles Chuah , Agnes Guerci-Bresler , Gianantonio Rosti , David Simpson , Stephanie Lustgarten , Nikolaus S. Trede , Victor M. Rivera , Tim Clackson , Frank G. Haluska , Michele Baccarani , Jorge E. Cortes , Francois Guilhot , Andreas Hochhaus , Timothy P. Hughes , Hagop M. Kantarjian , Neil P. Shah , Moshe Talpaz , Michael W.N. Deininger
Background: PON is a potent oral TKI active against native and mutated forms of BCR-ABL, including T315I. The ph 2 PACE study demonstrated that PON is highly active in heavily pretreated Ph+ leukemia pts. Methods: EPIC was an international, Ph 3 trial of PON (45 mg QD) vs IM (400 mg QD) in newly diagnosed CP-CML pts, with randomization stratified by Sokal risk score. The primary endpoint was major molecular response (MMR) rate at 1 yr. On 18 Oct 2013,EPIC was terminated due to accumulating vascular events in long-term follow-up of the PACE trial. Data as of 7 Oct 2013 are presented, median follow-up 3 (0.03-12) m. Results: At the time of analysis, 306 were randomized. Baseline characteristics were balanced for PON vs IM; median age 55 vs 52 yrs, 17% vs 16% high Sokal risk score, 62% vs 66% received prior hydroxyurea. Data on 267 treated pts were available (133 PON; 134 IM). 77% PON and 84% IM pts were ongoing; 14 PON and 6 IM pts D/C, (D/C due to AE; 9 PON pts [most common: thrombocytopenia and rash] and 1 IM pt). Response rates are in the table (evaluable pts). Most common (≥25%) all grade (G) AEs were PON: rash (36%), abdominal pain (32%), headache (31%), lipase increased (26%), myalgia (26%); IM: nausea (32%), muscle spasms (31%). 11% PON and 2% IM had G 3/4 thrombocytopenia; 3% PON and 8% IM had G 3/4 neutropenia. Serious AEs (SAEs) occurring in ≥3 PON pts were: pancreatitis (5 pts), atrial fibrillation (3), thrombocytopenia (3); no individual SAEs occurred in ≥3 IM pts. 9 (7%) PON and 5 (4%) IM pts experienced vascular occlusive events (SAEs: 6 PON, 1 IM). Updated data will be presented. Conclusions: While PON demonstrated early activity in frontline CP-CML, EPIC was terminated as its objectives could not be met with PON dose reductions implemented mid-trial due to safety observations in PACE. Further investigation of PON safety is warranted. PON remains an important treatment option for pretreated CML and Ph+ ALL pts in whom the need and benefit outweigh the risk. Clinical trial information: NCT01650805.
At 3 m |
At 6 m |
At 9 m |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PON | IM | PON | IM | PON | IM | |
MMR | 29% (28/95) | 0% (0/98) | 66% (27/41) | 21% (9/42) | 83% (10/12) | 44% (7/16) |
MR4.5 | 4% (4/95) | 0% (0/98) | 10% (4/41) | 0% (0/42) | 25% (3/12) | 0% (0/16) |
≤10% BCR-ABL transcripts |
94% (89/95) | 68% (67/98) | 100% (41/41) | 83% (35/42) |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2019 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Elias Jabbour
2013 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Jeffrey H. Lipton
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Angela Awino MCLIGEYO
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Nicholas James Short