Molecular profiling of EGFR pathway according to location of colorectal cancer (CRC): Analysis of 1,001 patients in single institute.

Authors

null

Eiji Shinozaki

Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan

Eiji Shinozaki , Yoshio Miki , Masashi Ueno , Masahiro Igarashi , Mitsukuni Suenaga , Keisho Chin , Masato Ozaka , Mariko Ogura , Toshiharu Yamaguchi , Nobuyuki Mizunuma

Organizations

Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan, Lab. of Genetic Diagnosis, Cancer Institute of JFCR, Tokyo, Japan, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterology Center, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR, Tokyo, Japan, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Location of colon cancer (right-sided versus left-sided) was reported as a predictor of benefit from cetuximab in the subanalysis of NCIC CTG CO.17 trial. On the other hand, retrospective analyses have identified KRAS including codon61, codon146, BRAF, NRAS, or PIK3CA mutations as potentially negative predictive factors for anti EGFR treatments. This analysis aimed to reveal the prevalence of these mutations in the EGFR pathway according to location of CRC in a large cohort. Methods: Consecutive patients of 1,001 CRC from January 2012 to October 2013 were analyzed in this study. Multiplex genotyping of EGFR pathway was performed on archival samples using Luminex Assay (MABGEN and GENOSEARCH Mu-PACK, MBL) for KRAS including codons 61 and 146, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA. We examined the correlation among mutation profile, clinical data and location of CRC. Statistical analysis was conducted by chi-square test. Results: The incidence of mutations; KRAS codon12 and 13, codon61 and 146, BRAF, NRAS and PIK3CA were 38%, 4.6%, 5.1%, 3.5% and 9.1%, respectively. So called all RAS mutations accounted for 47% in this cohort. The difference of prevalence according to the location of CRC was confirmed in KRAS codon 12 and 13, BRAF. The respective proportion of mutations were 55.9%, 14% for right sided(R), 30.6%, 5.5% for left sided(L), 37.2%, 1% for rectal(RC) CRC (KRAS: R vs L, RC P<0.01, BRAF: R vs L vs RC P<0.01). Conclusions: According to the location of CRC the incidence of KRAS codon 12 and 13, BRAF mutation were different. Increased BRAF mutation in R ,which was strong negative prognostic factor could affect unfavorable outcome of anti EGFR treatment.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Colorectal Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr 3597)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.3597

Abstract #

3597

Poster Bd #

60

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Mutation status of full RAS and BRAF in 169 Moroccan patients with colorectal cancer.

First Author: Sara El Zaitouni

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Frequency of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer in an Argentinian population.

First Author: Agustín Barbier