Clinical effects of prior anthracycline or taxane use on eribulin as first-line treatment for HER+/- locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (BC): Results from two phase II, multicenter, single-arm studies.

Authors

Stefan Gluck

Stefan Gluck

Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL

Stefan Gluck , Joyce O'Shaughnessy , Kristi McIntyre , Lee Steven Schwartzberg , Sharon Wilks , Shannon Puhalla , Erhan Berrak , James Song , David Cox , Linda T. Vahdat

Organizations

Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, US Oncology, Dallas, TX, Texas Oncology - Dallas Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas, TX, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, US Oncology Research, McKesson Specialty Health, San Antonio, TX, Magee Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, Eisai, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Eribulin mesylate, a novel nontaxane microtubule dynamics inhibitor, has demonstrated an overall survival benefit relative to other commonly used agents in pts with at least 2 prior MBC therapies. Primary data presented from 2 phase 2 trials, Study 206 (eribulin in HER2- pts) and Study 208 (combination eribulin + trastuzumab [TRAS] in HER2+ pts), showed clinical activity and acceptable tolerability profiles as first-line therapy (tx). Here we present prespecified efficacy data for both trials based on prior anthracycline (A) and taxane (T) use. Methods: In both studies, pts received eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m2IV on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle. Pts in Study 208 (HER2+ pts) also received initial TRAS (8 mg/kg IV/Day 1), followed by 6 mg/kg/Day 1 of each subsequent cycle. Response, progression-free survival (PFS), and tolerability were assessed. Results: In Study 206 (N=56), 48% and 46% received prior A and T, and in Study 208 (N=52), 21% and 44% received prior A and T, respectively. Objective response rates (ORRs), the primary endpoint, were similar in pts, regardless of prior A or T tx, except in pts w/o prior T in Study 208 whose ORR trended higher (table). In both studies, clinical benefit rate (CBR), PFS, and duration of response (DOR) were either similar or trended higher in pts w/o prior A or T. PFS was higher in HER2+ pts receiving eribulin + TRAS who had not received prior A or T compared with those who had. Grade (G) 3-5 AE rates were similar or lower in pts who had not received prior A or T. Conclusions: As first-line therapy, eribulin in HER2- pts and eribulin + TRAS in HER2+ pts were effective and well tolerated, regardless of prior A or T tx. However, in HER2+ pts receiving eribulin + TRAS, the lack of prior A or T tx may be a predictor of longer median PFS. Clinical trial information: NCT01268150 and NCT01269346.

Prior A/T use Study 206
(N=56)
(eribulin only)
Study 208
(N=52)
(eribulin/TRAS)
A w/o A T w/o T A w/o A T w/o T
n 27 29 26 30 11 41 23 29
ORR, n (%) 7 (26) 9 (31) 7 (27) 9 (30) 7 (64) 30 (73) 13 (57) 24 (83)
CBR, n (%) 13 (48) 16 (55) 12 (46) 17 (57) 9 (82) 41 (100) 19 (83) 25 (86)
PFS, m (median) 5.8 6.9 5.8 7.6 6.7 11.6 6.8 13.1
DOR, m (median) 5.7 7.4 4.7 9.7 11.1 11.8 7.5 11.8

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer - HER2/ER

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

HER2+

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01268150 and NCT01269346

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr 629^)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.629

Abstract #

629^

Poster Bd #

93

Abstract Disclosures