Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors for primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma: The MD Anderson experience.

Authors

Mohamed Ahmed

Mohamed Amin Ahmed

Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Mohamed Amin Ahmed , Ramona Barac , L Jeffrey Medeiros , Long Ma , Luis Fayad , Jorge Enrique Romaguera , Yasuhiro Oki , M.Alma Rodriguez , Chelsea Pinnix , Larry W. Kwak , Fredrick B. Hagemeister Jr., Richard Eric Davis , Jason R. Westin

Organizations

Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, houston, TX, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBL) has been treated with different chemotherapy regimens. We reviewed medical records and histopathology to determine predictive factors and outcomes for patients (pts) with PMBL seen at the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) between 1995 and 2013. Methods: Baseline characteristics complete (CR) and partial (PR) response to initial therapy, and status of disease and survival over time were collected. Event-free survival (EFS) was based on dates of relapse, progression, or death. Radiotherapy data will be presented separately. Results: 274 pts with PMBL were identified, making this the largest single-center retrospective report of PMBL. Median age was 40 years (range, 17-86), and 149 pts (54%) were female. For patients treated with R, the CR rates were higher, and EFS and overall survival (OS) were improved for all pts at the median follow-up (MFU) of 38 months (mo), and for CHOP-treated pts at MFU of 37 mo (Table). As R is now standard with initial therapy, we analyzed results for the 3 main R-containing therapies (Table). By univariate log-rank analysis, therapy choice affected the CR rate, and EFS at MFU of 39 mo. R-HCVAD had superior EFS vs. R-CHOP (p=0.015), even though low-stage pts were more common for R-CHOP. For pts given the 3 main R-containing therapies, higher stage (III/IV vs. I/II) was an adverse univariate predictor for EFS (p=0.036) and OS (p=0.04), and B symptoms were adverse for OS (p = 0.026). Multivariate Cox analysis including stage, B symptoms, and therapy (CHOP vs. EPOCH/HCVAD) found only B symptoms to be predictive of shorter OS (p = 0.032), and only treatment to be predictive of shorter EFS (p=0.029). Conclusions: Response rates and survival outcomes are improved for pts with PMBL by R and its use with intensified therapy (R-HCVAD or R-EPOCH). Longer follow-up is needed to compare R-HCVAD and R-EPOCH.

Rituximab (R)
No (n=74)
Yes (n=200)
P value
Front line CHOP Triple therapy Other Other R-CHOP R-HCVAD R-EPOCH
Patients, # 42 25 7 6 123 41 30
CR, % 58 81 <0.001
EFS, % 37 72 <0.001
OS, % 58 87 <0.001
EFS, % 35 65 <0.001
OS, % 51 86 <0.001
CR, % 76 93 83 0.046
CR+PR, % 90 98 97 NS
EFS, % 65 88 79 0.013
OS, % 85 92 100 NS
Stage I/II, % 83 61 77 0.014

Abbreviation: NS, not significant.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Lymphoma and Plasma Cell Disorders

Track

Hematologic Malignancies—Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Sub Track

Lymphoma

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr 8564)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.8564

Abstract #

8564

Poster Bd #

251

Abstract Disclosures