One-year and longer-term molecular responses to nilotinib and dasatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: A matching-adjusted indirect comparison.

Authors

null

James E. Signorovitch

Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA

James E. Signorovitch , Eric Qiong Wu , Keith A. Betts , William M. Reichmann , Darren Thomason , Philip J Galebach , Lei Chen

Organizations

Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, Analysis Group, Boston, MA, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Nilotinib and dasatinib are BCR-ABL inhibitors that markedly differ in selectivity. In separate randomized trials, nilotinib and dasatinib have shown superior achievement of molecular response (MR) compared to imatinib for the treatment of newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in the chronic phase (CP). In the absence of head-to-head trials, health technology assessment authorities rely on indirect comparisons to inform drug policies. This study compares MR between nilotinib 300mg twice daily and dasatinib 100mg once daily by 12 months and through 48 months via indirect comparison. Methods: Data were drawn from individual patients in the ENESTnd trial (nilotinib vs. imatinib) and published results from the DASISION trial (dasatinib vs. imatinib). Patients in ENESTnd were re-weighted to match baseline characteristics reported for DASISION (age, sex, ECOG performance status, white cell count, and platelet count) using a propensity score model. After matching, differences in major MR (MMR measured as a 3-log reduction on the International Scale [IS]), MR4.0 (4-log reduction on IS) and MR4.5(4.5-log reduction on IS) rates between nilotinib and imatinib were compared with those between dasatinib and imatinib. Cumulative MR rates through 48 months were also compared using adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) relative to imatinib. Results: After matching, rates of MR by 12 months were higher with nilotinib vs. dasatinib by 11.7% for MMR (p = 0.045), 8.2% for MR4.0 (p = 0.029), and 8.5% for MR4.5 (p < 0.001). Through 48 months of follow-up, the adjusted HR comparing MMR achievement with nilotinib vs. dasatinib was 1.44 (95% CI: 1.06, 1.94; p=0.018); the corresponding HRs for MR4.0 and MR4.5were 1.58 (95% CI: 1.10, 2.26; p=0.013) and 1.30 (95% CI: 0.86, 1.99; p=0.218), respectively. Conclusions: This indirect comparison suggested that nilotinib 300mg twice daily was associated with higher rates of achieving MMR, MR4.0, and MR4.5 by 12 months compared to dasatinib 100mg once daily for the treatment of newly diagnosed CML-CP. Higher rates of MR achievement with nilotinib were also maintained through 48 months of follow-up.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Leukemia, Myelodysplasia, and Transplantation

Track

Hematologic Malignancies—Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, and Allotransplant

Sub Track

Leukemia

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00471497

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr 7072)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.7072

Abstract #

7072

Poster Bd #

357

Abstract Disclosures