Patterns of chemotherapy (CT) use in a population-based US-wide cohort of patients (pts) with metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC).

Authors

Thomas Abrams

Thomas Adam Abrams

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

Thomas Adam Abrams , Gary Meyer , Julie Moloney , Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt , Brian M. Wolpin , Deborah Schrag , Charles S. Fuchs

Organizations

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, IntrinsiQ, LLC an AmerisourceBergen Specialty Group Company, Burlington, MA

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Few population studies have examined the frequencies and durations of specific CT treatment regimens in MPC. Methods: We assessed 3,796 consecutive MPC pts who received CT between Jan 2005 and Aug 2013 at academic, private and community hospital-based practices participating in a US-wide CT order entry system that captures pt, provider and treatment data. Multivariate analyses of prospectively recorded pt and provider characteristics identified predictors of specific therapeutic approaches. Results: Among all pts, median age was 70; 55% male. In 1st-line CT, 48% of pts received gemcitabine (GEM) monotherapy, 16% received a GEM-based doublet (incl. GEM + nab-paclitaxel [NAB-P]), 9% received fluoropyrimidine (FU) + oxaliplatin (OX) + irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX), 9% received FU monotherapy, and 5% received FU + OX (FOLFOX). The remaining 13% received other regimens. GEM monotherapy use peaked at 58% in 2009 but declined to 28% in 2013. FOLFIRINOX use emerged in 2010 with 4% usage and peaked at 23% in 2012. Since 2012, GEM + NAB-P use has risen substantially, representing 20% of first-line therapy in 2013. GEM + cisplatin use declined steadily from 2010 (9%) to 2013 (3%). Pts under age 60 and those treated at academic centers were more likely to receive first-line FOLFIRINOX and less likely to receive GEM monotherapy (both p<0.05). Mean duration of all 1st-line treatments was 87 days. 31% of all pts received 2nd-line treatment, 13% third-line, and 5% fourth-line. Second-line CTs included GEM monotherapy (28%), FOLFOX (14%), FOLFIRINOX (7%) and GEM + NAB-P (6%). 37% of pts who received second-line GEM + NAB-P received 1st-line FOLFIRINOX. Conclusions: This population-based study provides insight into US MPC treatment patterns. Treatments vary significantly according to patient and practice characteristics.

MPC first-line CT treatment trends (2005-2013).
2005-2009 2010-2011 2012 2013†
# Pts 1,694 1,111 604 387
GEM (%) 57.6 48.1 33.0 28.4
GEM doublet‡ (%) 16.1 8.6 11.4 9.3
GEM + NAB-P (%) 0.2 2.1 4.0 20.4
FOLFOX (%) 2.3 5.8 8.9 2.3
FOLFIRINOX (%) 0.1 11.8 23.3 20.7
FU (%) 9.5 9.0 8.4 11.9
Other (%) 14.2 14.6 11.0 7.0

†Through Aug 31 (data through Dec 31, 2013 will be presented at the meeting). ‡Not including GEM + NAB-P.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Pancreatic Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr 4131)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.4131

Abstract #

4131

Poster Bd #

218

Abstract Disclosures