Comparative effectiveness of contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy among older rectal cancer patients.

Authors

null

Jennifer Leigh Lund

Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC

Jennifer Leigh Lund , Til Sturmer , Hanna Kelly Sanoff

Organizations

Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Guidelines for stage II and III rectal cancer in the US recommend neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT), curative resection, and adjuvant chemotherapy. This paradigm is based on early trials without neoadjuvant CRT and extrapolations from colon cancer. Recent trials have called into question whether adjuvant chemotherapy improves overall survival (OS) among patients treated with neoadjuvant CRT. We sought to examine whether chemotherapy improves OS in patients treated with neoadjuvant CRT or radiation therapy (RT) and surgery in real world settings. Methods: We identified a population-based cohort of 1,431 older (65+ years) non-metastatic rectal cancer patients diagnosed from 2004-2009 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results program (SEER)-Medicare data, who underwent neoadjuvant CRT or RT and curative resection. We described patterns of adjuvant chemotherapy using binomial regression models and evaluated the comparative effectiveness of: 1) any adjuvant chemotherapy vs. no adjuvant chemotherapy and 2) adjuvant oxaliplatin+5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/capecitabine vs. 5-FU/capecitabine on OS using Cox proportional hazards regression models and propensity score (PS) matching to adjust for measured covariates. Results: In total, 744 patients (52%) received adjuvant chemotherapy; most received oxaliplatin (53%). Older age, lower pathologic stage, and being widowed were associated with a lower likelihood of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Unadjusted and PS adjusted survival was superior in patients treated with chemotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR)=0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57, 0.89). Among patients receiving adjuvant therapy, older age, earlier year of diagnosis, lower stage, and higher census tract poverty level were associated with a lower likelihood of receiving oxaliplatin. The addition of oxaliplatin to 5-FU/capecitabine did not improve OS after PS matching (aHR=1.15, 95% CI: 0.78, 1.70). Conclusions: Our results suggest that older non-metastatic rectal cancer patients benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy; however, the addition of oxaliplatin to 5-FU/capecitabine may not provide any incremental benefit.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Colorectal Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr 3579)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.3579

Abstract #

3579

Poster Bd #

42

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Runkai Cai

First Author: Shin Kameishi