Randomized phase II study of regorafenib followed by cetuximab versus reverse sequence for wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (REVERCE).

Authors

Kohei Shitara

Kohei Shitara

National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan

Kohei Shitara , Kentaro Yamazaki , Hiroyuki Uetake , Takeshi Kato , Eiji Oki , Takeharu Yamanaka , Yasuo Ohashi , Takayuki Yoshino

Organizations

National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan, Department of Translational Oncology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School, Tokyo, Japan, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan, Department of Surgery and Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan, Department of Biostatistics, National Cancer Center, Kashiwa, Japan, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Regorafenib (RE) and cetuximab (CE) are both effective treatments for patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with the current standard sequence as CE followed by RE. For optimal continuum of care for mCRC pts, it is important to compare efficacy and safety of different sequential treatments. Furthermore, several possible biomarkers including oncogenic mutations and serum protein have been identified for both RE and CE treatment so far. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sequential treatment of RE followed by CE as compared with CE followed by RE. Exploratory objective is to investigate several biomarkers with an aim of producing findings that may be useful in elucidating the mechanism of resistance to each agent and contribute to future individualized therapy. Methods: This multicenter randomized phase II trial will enroll pts with KRAS wild-type mCRC after failure of chemotherapy including fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (UMIN000011294). Pts will be randomized (1:1; stratified by prior use of bevacizumab and intent to use irinotecan in combination with CE) to receive sequential treatment with RE followed by CE ± irinotecan or reverse sequence (CE ± irinotecan followed by RE). Primary endpoint is overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints include time to sequential treatment failure (TTF), progression-free survival (PFS) of sequential treatment, anti-tumor effects (response rate, disease control rate) of RE or CE, safety, and patients reported outcome of quality of life (QOL). Exploratory endpoint is to investigate possible biomarkers including oncogenic mutations from circulating cell free DNA by liquid biopsy with serial measurement and multiple serum proteins related to epidermal growth factor receptor or vascular endothelial growth factor pathway change over time at several point of sequential treatment. To evaluate the similarity of OS between both arms (HR between 0.8 and 1.25), the sample size was planned as 180 subjects in total to observe 132 deaths with 1.5-year enrollment and subsequent 1.5-year follow-up periods. As of 21 Jan 2014, eight pts have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: UMIN000011294.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Colorectal Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

UMIN000011294

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr TPS3662)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.tps3662

Abstract #

TPS3662

Poster Bd #

118A

Abstract Disclosures