Prof. Dr. I. Chiricuta Institute of Oncology, Cluj County, Romania
Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu , Igor Bazin , Dan Lungulescu , Lucian Miron , Igor Bondarenko , Andrzej Deptala , Maribel Rodriguez-Torres , Bruce J. Giantonio , Weijing Sun , Norma Lynn Fox , Gursel Aktan , Paul Stephen Wissel , Jacki Egger , Meichun Ding , Rubana Kalyani , Matthew Joseph Gribbin
Background: TRAIL is a member of the tumor necrosis factor ligand super family that induces programmed cell death primarily in tumor cells (including liver tumors) through TRAIL death receptors. Mapatumumab (M) is an agonistic monoclonal antibody that targets one of the TRAIL death receptors, TRAIL-R1, and may promote apoptosis of cancer cells. Methods: Patients (Pts) with chemotherapy-naive advanced HCC were randomized 1:1 to sorafenib 400 mg BID continuously + IV Placebo (SP) or sorafenib 400 mg BID continuously + mapatumumab 30 mg/kg (SM) on day 1 every 21 days. Stratification variables were BCLC C vs B, and ECOG PS 0 vs 1, 2. Eligibility: bilirubin < 3 mg/dL, AST and ALT ≥ 5 x ULN, and INR ≥ 1.5. Radiologic progression was determined by blinded independent central review. The primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP). The sample size of 100 was sufficient to estimate median TTP with a precision of -1.9 to +2.6 months (mo). Results: 101 pts were in the ITT population: 51 SP and 50 SM. Treatment arms were balanced for the stratification variables. Demographics (SP vs SM): mean AFP 3177.7 vs 1534 mg/L, Male 76.5% vs 52%, Age 60.8 vs 60 years. Median (med) duration of M dosing was 3.3 mo and 84% pts received ≥ 90% of planned dose. Med cumulative sorafenib (S) dose (SP vs SM) was 73600 vs 75200 mg; 52.9% (SP) and 54% (SM) received ≥ 90% of the planned S dose. Conclusions: The addition of mapatumumab to sorafenib did not improve TTP (primary endpoint) or other efficacy endpoints. The combination did not substantially change the toxicity profile of sorafenib. Clinical trial information: NCT01258608.
Treatment groups | ||
---|---|---|
SP | SM | |
N | 51 | 50 |
Median TTP (mo)1 | 5.6 | 4.1 |
Median TTP at | ||
ECOG 0 (mo) ECOG 1 or 2 (mo) BCLC Stage C(mo) BCLC Stage B (mo) |
6.9 5.6 5.4 11.1 |
4.1 4.2 4.2 4.1 |
Median OS (mo) | 10.1 | 10.0 |
Overall Response (pts) | 5 | 7 |
% | % | |
AEs of interest to S and M | ||
Diarrhea | 37.3 | 32.0 |
Blood bilirubin increased | 17.6 | 14.0 |
Rash | 7.8 | 12.0 |
Related AEs to S/M | ||
Blood bilirubin increased | 5.9/3.9 | 4.0/2.0 |
Fatal AEs | 25.5 | 24.0 |
Serious AEs | 51.0 | 40.0 |
Gastrointestinal disorders | 11.8 | 12.0 |
1P-value 0.7382, HR (90% CI) 1.192 (0, 1.737). P-value for comparison of treatment groups from stratified log-rank test – stratified by BCLC and ECOG PS.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Arndt Vogel
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Sidra Naz
2023 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Philippe Merle
2023 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Mingyue Cai