Comparison of clinical primary tumor site (PTS) response to induction chemotherapy (IC) with APF (nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin, and 5-FU) or APF plus cetuximab (APF+Cetux) in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

Authors

null

Jessica C. Ley

Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO

Jessica C. Ley , Brian Nussenbaum , Jason Diaz , Jason Rich , Randal Paniello , Ravi Uppaluri , Wade L. Thorstad , Hiram Alberto Gay , Toni Rachocki , Jaisy Varges , Tanya Marya Wildes , Loren S. Michel , Douglas Adkins

Organizations

Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, Division of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Achievement of a favorable (> PR) response (particularly CR) at the PTS to IC predicts a higher likelihood of long-term disease control after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in SCCHN. Low T classification and p16 + oropharynx [OP]SCCHN associate with favorable PTS response to IC. Based on improved tumor response rate with cetuximab added to chemotherapy in the EXTREME trial, we hypothesized a higher PTS CR rate with the addition of cetuximab to APF given as IC before CRT. Methods: Two consecutive prospective phase II trials (APF and APF+Cetux) were performed with the primary objective to determine the response rates (CR, PR, <PR) at the PTS. 30 patients were treated with APF (weekly nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 and every 3 week cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and 5-FU 750 mg/m2/dayx3) and 30 patients were treated with APF+Cetux (APF + weekly cetuximab 250 mg/m2). After two cycles of IC, PTS response assessment by clinical exam was performed by experienced oncologic otolaryngologists. Patients were then scheduled for a third cycle of IC followed by definitive CRT (with cisplatin). Results: After two cycles of APF or APF+Cetux, CR rates at the PTS were 76.7% (23 patients) and 53% (16 patients), respectively. PR and <PR rates at the PTS after two cycles of APF were 16.7% (5 patients) and 6.7% (2 patients) and after APF+Cetux were 47% (14 patients) and 0%, respectively. CR rates at the PTS were consistently higher with APF compared to APF+Cetux when stratified for T classification and p16 status (Table). Conclusions: Unexpectedly, the addition of cetuximab to APF did not increase the CR rate at the PTS even when stratified for T classification and p16 status. This observation is consistent with our historical experience of TPF+Cetux (Adkins et al ASCO 2011 #5560). Validation of these findings in a randomized trial is indicated. Clinical trial information: NCT01566435 AND NCT00736944.

Characteristic APF (n=30)
APF+Cetux (n=30)
No. % No. %
T2 # 8 - 8 -
CR 8 100 4 50
PR 0 0 4 50
T3 # 13 - 11 -
CR 9 69 6 55
PR 4 31 5 45
T4 # 9 - 11 -
CR 6 67 6 55
PR 1 11 5 45
<PR 2 22 0 0
P16+ OPSCC* # 17 - 17 -
CR 13 76 11 65
PR 3 18 6 35
<PR 1 6 0 0
P16- SCCHN # 13 - 12 -
CR 10 77 4 33
PR 2 15 8 67
<PR 1 8 0 0

* p16 not performed in 1.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Highlights Session

Session Title

Head and Neck Cancer

Track

Head and Neck Cancer

Sub Track

Head and Neck Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01566435 AND NCT00736944

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr 6013)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.6013

Abstract #

6013

Poster Bd #

28

Abstract Disclosures