Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
Jessica C. Ley , Brian Nussenbaum , Jason Diaz , Jason Rich , Randal Paniello , Ravi Uppaluri , Wade L. Thorstad , Hiram Alberto Gay , Toni Rachocki , Jaisy Varges , Tanya Marya Wildes , Loren S. Michel , Douglas Adkins
Background: Achievement of a favorable (> PR) response (particularly CR) at the PTS to IC predicts a higher likelihood of long-term disease control after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in SCCHN. Low T classification and p16 + oropharynx [OP]SCCHN associate with favorable PTS response to IC. Based on improved tumor response rate with cetuximab added to chemotherapy in the EXTREME trial, we hypothesized a higher PTS CR rate with the addition of cetuximab to APF given as IC before CRT. Methods: Two consecutive prospective phase II trials (APF and APF+Cetux) were performed with the primary objective to determine the response rates (CR, PR, <PR) at the PTS. 30 patients were treated with APF (weekly nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 and every 3 week cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and 5-FU 750 mg/m2/dayx3) and 30 patients were treated with APF+Cetux (APF + weekly cetuximab 250 mg/m2). After two cycles of IC, PTS response assessment by clinical exam was performed by experienced oncologic otolaryngologists. Patients were then scheduled for a third cycle of IC followed by definitive CRT (with cisplatin). Results: After two cycles of APF or APF+Cetux, CR rates at the PTS were 76.7% (23 patients) and 53% (16 patients), respectively. PR and <PR rates at the PTS after two cycles of APF were 16.7% (5 patients) and 6.7% (2 patients) and after APF+Cetux were 47% (14 patients) and 0%, respectively. CR rates at the PTS were consistently higher with APF compared to APF+Cetux when stratified for T classification and p16 status (Table). Conclusions: Unexpectedly, the addition of cetuximab to APF did not increase the CR rate at the PTS even when stratified for T classification and p16 status. This observation is consistent with our historical experience of TPF+Cetux (Adkins et al ASCO 2011 #5560). Validation of these findings in a randomized trial is indicated. Clinical trial information: NCT01566435 AND NCT00736944.
Characteristic | APF (n=30) |
APF+Cetux (n=30) |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
No. | % | No. | % | |
T2 # | 8 | - | 8 | - |
CR | 8 | 100 | 4 | 50 |
PR | 0 | 0 | 4 | 50 |
T3 # | 13 | - | 11 | - |
CR | 9 | 69 | 6 | 55 |
PR | 4 | 31 | 5 | 45 |
T4 # | 9 | - | 11 | - |
CR | 6 | 67 | 6 | 55 |
PR | 1 | 11 | 5 | 45 |
<PR | 2 | 22 | 0 | 0 |
P16+ OPSCC* # | 17 | - | 17 | - |
CR | 13 | 76 | 11 | 65 |
PR | 3 | 18 | 6 | 35 |
<PR | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
P16- SCCHN # | 13 | - | 12 | - |
CR | 10 | 77 | 4 | 33 |
PR | 2 | 15 | 8 | 67 |
<PR | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
* p16 not performed in 1.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2019 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Felix Keil
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Robert L. Ferris
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Yulia Vugmeyster
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Lara Dunn