Second-line therapies in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after first-line therapy with FOLFIRI in combination with cetuximab or bevacizumab in the AIO KRK0306 (FIRE 3) trial.

Authors

null

Dominik Paul Modest

Department of Medical Oncology, Klinikum Grosshadern, University of Munich, Munich, Germany

Dominik Paul Modest , Sebastian Stintzing , Ludwig Fischer Von Weikersthal , Thomas Decker , Alexander Kiani , Ursula Vehling-Kaiser , Salah-Eddin Al-Batran , Tobias Heintges , Christian A. Lerchenmuller , Christoph Kahl , Gernot Seipelt , Frank Kullmann , Martina Stauch , Werner Scheithauer , Swantje Held , Clemens Albrecht Giessen , Andreas Jung , Thomas Kirchner , Volker Heinemann

Organizations

Department of Medical Oncology, Klinikum Grosshadern, University of Munich, Munich, Germany, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Klinikum Grosshadern and Comprehensive Cancer Center, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany, Gesundheitszentrum St Marien, Amberg, Germany, Onkologie Ravensburg, Ravensburg, Germany, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany, Practice for Medical Oncology, Landshut, Germany, Institute of Clinical Cancer Research (IKF) at Krankenhaus Nordwest, UCT-University Cancer Center, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, Städtisches Klinikum Neuss Lukaskrankenhaus GmbH, Medical Department II, Neuss, Germany, Private Practice for Oncology, Muenster, Germany, Department for Hematology, Klinikum Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany, Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Bad Soden, Germany, Klinikum Weiden, Weiden, Germany, Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Kronach, Kronach, Germany, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, ClinAssess GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany, Department of Internal Medicine III, Klinikum Grosshadern, University of Munich, Munich, Germany, Department of Pathology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: AIO KRK0306 (FIRE 3) trial compared first-line therapy with FOLFIRI plus either cetuximab (arm A) or bevacizumab (arm B) in 592 patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We investigated choice and duration of second-line therapies, as well as overall survival (OS) and OS from beginning of second-line therapy according to second-line treatment. Methods: The protocol recommended second-line therapy with FOLFOX plus bevacizumab vs. irinotecan plus cetuximab in arm A vs. B, but physician were free to choose any regimen. second-line treatment was defined as any new anticancer drug for mCRC following first-line therapy. Duration of second-line therapy was calculated as time from first to last application of second-line treatment. Results: There were 260/297 patients in arm A and 250/295 patients in arm B who were alive after first-line therapy. Of those, 78.5% of patients arm A and 76.4% in arm B received second-line therapy so far. First-line progression free survival (PFS) according to second-line antibody use was associated with 9.2 (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF]), comparing to 9.7 (anti-epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR]) and 11.3 months (no mAB); p=0.001. Correspondingly, OS was 25.2 (anti-VEGF) vs. 23.7 (anti-EGFR) vs. 30.8 months (no mAB), p=0.02. First-line PFS according to seconnd-line oxaliplatin (Ox) use was associated with 9.9 (Ox), comparing to 9.9 months (no Ox); p=0.56. OS according to Ox-use was 27.1 (ox) vs. 29.1 months (no Ox); p=0.10. 2nd-line therapy was administered for a median of 17.2 weeks in arm A and 14.0 weeks in arm b (p=0.08). Second-line regimens with antibody-crossover were administered for a median of 23.9 weeks in arm A and 16.1 weeks arm B (p=0.06). Updated results might be presented at the annual meeting. Conclusions: This retrospective analysis indicates that second-line application of antibodies was favoured in patients with shorter first-line PFS, suggesting that preplanned second-line therapy may not reflect therapeutic reality. Correspondingly, second-line treatment without antibodies compared to antibody-based regimens was associated with longer OS. A trend towards longer second-line therapy was observed in favour of patients receiving cetuximab as first-line therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT00433927.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Colorectal Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00433927

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr 3558^)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.3558

Abstract #

3558^

Poster Bd #

21

Abstract Disclosures