Effect of multifocality and multicentricity on outcome in early breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors

null

Francisco Emilio Vera-Badillo

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre - University Health Network, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Francisco Emilio Vera-Badillo , Marc Napoleone , Alberto Ocana , Arnoud J. Templeton , Bostjan Seruga , Mustafa Al-Mubarak , Hashem Yaseen Al Hashem , Ian Tannock , Eitan Amir

Organizations

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre - University Health Network, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, AECC Cancer Research Unit, Albacete University Hospital, Albacete, Spain, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia, Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Women with multifocal or multicentric breast tumors (multifocality henceforth) have been reported to have greater probability of nodal metastasis and relapse and worse survival than women with unifocal tumors. However, these associations have been inconsistent and multifocality is not taken into account by staging guidelines and prognostic models. Methods: A systematic review of Medline and EMBASE (host: Ovid) from 1946 to July 2013 identified publications exploring the association between multifocality and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and loco-regional relapse (LRR). The hazard ratios (HR) for OS and DFS for multifocal compared to unifocal tumors were extracted from multivariable analyses and included in a meta-analysis. For studies not reporting multivariable analyses, odds ratios (OR) were estimated from Kaplan-Meier curves for all endpoints at 5 and 10 years. Results: Twenty-two studies comprising 67,557 women were included. Multifocality was reported in 9.5% of patients. Classical prognostic factors were well balanced between unifocal and multifocal populations. In multivariable analyses, multifocality was associated with significantly worse OS (HR=1.65, p=0.02), and a non-significant association with worse DFS (HR=1.96, p=0.07). Inter-study heterogeneity was significant (Cochran Q p<0.001 in both analyses). Similar results were observed for the odds of death or disease recurrence by 5 years (OR=1.39, p=0.02; OR=1.52, p=0.02, respectively). Additionally, multifocality was associated with worse DSS and a higher odds of LRR (OR=1.56, p=0.03; and OR=3.23, p=0.02, respectively). Similar estimates were observed at 10 years but statistical significance was only reached for DSS and LRR (OS: OR=1.40, p=0.07; DFS: OR=1.49, p=0.06; DSS: OR=1.69, p<0.001; LRR: OR=2.94, p=0.03). Conclusions: Multifocality appears to be associated with a worse prognosis. Substantial inter-study heterogeneity limits the precise determination of increased risk; however, the inclusion of multifocality as an independent prognostic factor appears warranted.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer - HER2/ER

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

ER+

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr 546)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.546

Abstract #

546

Poster Bd #

10

Abstract Disclosures