Obesity and the odds of weight gain following androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: Toward a risk adapted approach for ADT use.

Authors

null

Lior Zvi Braunstein

Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Boston, MA

Lior Zvi Braunstein , Ming-Hui Chen , Marian J. Loffredo , Philip W. Kantoff , Anthony Victor D'Amico

Organizations

Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Boston, MA, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

Research Funding

Other

Background: Increasing BMI is associated with an increased risk of mortality; however, quantifying weight gain in men undergoing ADT for prostate cancer (PC) as stratified by baseline BMI remains unexplored and was the subject of the current study. Methods: Between 1995 and 2001, 206 men with unfavorable-risk prostate cancer were enrolled on a randomized trial evaluating the impact on survival of adding 6-months of ADT to radiotherapy (RT). BMI, both at baseline and after therapy, was available in 171 men who formed the study cohort. The primary endpoint was weight gain of ≥10 lbs by the 6-month follow-up. Logistic regression multivariable analysis was performed to assess whether baseline BMI or treatment-received was associated with this endpoint adjusting for comorbidity and known PC prognostic factors. Results: By the 6 month follow-up, 12 men were observed to have gained ≥10 lbs of which 10 (83%) were treated with RT and ADT and, of these, 7 (70%) were obese at randomization. As shown in the table, men treated with RT as compared to RT and ADT were significantly less likely to experience a weight gain of ≥ 10 pounds (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 0.18 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04 - 0.89]; p = 0.04); whereas this risk was significantly increased with increasing BMI (AOR: 1.15 [ 95% CI 1.01 – 1.31]; p = 0.04). Moreover, weight gain persisted at 2 years for the obese men who gained ≥ 10 lbs after treatment with RT and ADT (median: 13.0 lbs; range: 9.0 to 21.0). Conclusions: Consideration should be given to avoiding ADT use in obese men with low or favorable-intermediate risk PC where improved cancer control has not been observed, but a shortened life expectancy from weight gain is expected. Clinical trial information: NCT00116220.

Clinical factor No. of men No. of men who gained ≥ 10 lbs by EOT Multivariable analysis
AOR (95% CI) P value
RT 85 2 0.18
(0.04, 0.89)
0.04
RT + AST 86 10 1 (Ref) -
BMI increase per kg/m2 171 12 1.15
(1.01, 1.31)
0.04
PSA increase per ng/mL 171 12 0.97
(0.87, 1.08)
0.57
Age 171 12 0.95
(0.85, 1.06)
0.38
Gleason score 8 to 10 26 3 1.17
(0.17, 7.93)
0..87
7 94 6 0.55
(0.10, 3.06)
0.49
6 or less 51 3 1 (Ref) -
T2 88 8 1.99
(0.49, 7.99)
0.33
T1 83 4 1 (ref) -
Mod to sev comorbidity 41 5 2.11
(0.54, 8.26)
0.28
No or min comorbidity 130 7 1 -

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Genitourinary (Prostate) Cancer

Track

Genitourinary Cancer

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00116220

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr 5045)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.5045

Abstract #

5045

Poster Bd #

174

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Abdenour Nabid

First Author: Daniel Eidelberg Spratt

First Author: Abdenour Nabid