Comprehensive molecular profiling of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) using NGS and immunohistochemistry (IHC).

Authors

null

Yasutoshi Kuboki

Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology/Gastroenterology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan

Yasutoshi Kuboki , Toru Niwa , Akiko Nagatsuma , Kohei Shitara , Nozomu Fuse , Satoshi Yamashita , Toshihiko Doi , Toshikazu Ushijima , Atsushi Ochiai , Atsushi Ohtsu

Organizations

Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology/Gastroenterology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan, Exploratory Oncology Research & Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center, Kashiwa, Japan, Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology and Digestive Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan, Research Center for Innovative Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: In advanced gastric cancer, most of clinical trials are designed based on IHC/in situ hybridization in tissue. However, NGS screening allowed us to comprehensively profile tumor gene status recently. Our goal is to profile both gene alterations and conventional biomarker in gastric cancer for potential molecular targeted therapy. Methods: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples from 121 patients with stage III/IV gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy were examined for HER2, EGFR, c-MET and FGFR2 expression using IHC. In addition, genomic DNA was extracted from each FFPE sample and a total of 15,991 regions in 409 cancer-related genes were sequenced to detect mutations using the Ion AmpliSeq Library kit 2.0 and Comprehensive Cancer Panel. In addition, to evaluate copy number variation of a gene, relative reading depth to the reference (RRDR) of an individual gene was calculated. Amplification was defined as an RRDR greater than 2. Results: The most frequently mutated genes were TP53 (36.4%). In addition, mutations in oncogenes such as PIK3CA (7.4%), ROS1 (4.1%), HER2 (4.1%), MET (1.7%) and ALK (1.7%) were detected. The most frequently amplified gene was SRC (20.7%). Amplification was also detected for other genes such as HER2 (14.9%), CCNE1 (13.2%), CCND1 (9.1%), EGFR (7.4%), KRAS (7.4%), MET (6.6%), RET (3.3%) and FGFR2 (2.5%). The rate of over-expression (IHC 3+) was as follows: HER2 (16.5%), EGFR (23.1%), MET (9.9%) and FGFR2 (14.0%). Most of the cases with HER2 over-expression had HER2 amplification. On the other hand, in a few cases with EGFR/c-MET/FGFR2 over-expression, amplification of these genes was not detected. Over-expression cases with EGFR or FGFR2 had other various gene alterations such as PIK3CA mutations and/or KRAS alterations. In contrast, HER2 or c-MET over-expression cases were mutually exclusive with respect to PIK3CA mutations. Conclusions: We identified several possible candidate genes that could be targets for personalized therapy. Comprehensive analyses including IHC will be necessary to design the optimal therapy with which to treat the right population of patients in future clinical trials.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Highlights Session

Session Title

Tumor Biology

Track

Tumor Biology

Sub Track

Genomic and Epigenomic Biomarkers

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr 11027)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.11027

Abstract #

11027

Poster Bd #

16

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Nilesh Verma

Abstract

2023 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Circulating tumor DNA–based genomic landscape of KRAS wild-type pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

First Author: Brendon Fusco

First Author: David H Aggen

First Author: Alissa Jamie Cooper