Enzalutamide monotherapy: Extended follow-up of a phase II study in hormone-naive prostate cancer patients.

Authors

Bertrand Tombal

Bertrand Tombal

Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium

Bertrand Tombal , Michael Borre , Per Rathenborg , Patrick Werbrouck , Hendrik Van Poppel , Axel Heidenreich , Peter Iversen , Johan Braeckman , Jiri Heracek , Edwina Baskin-Bey , Taoufik Ouatas , Frank Perabo , De Phung , Matthew R. Smith

Organizations

Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium, Åarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark, AZ Groeninge Kortrijk, Kortrijk, Belgium, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, RWTH University Aachen, Aachen, Germany, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium, Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Prague, Czech Republic, Astellas Pharma Global Development, Leiden, Netherlands, Astellas Pharma Global Development, Northbrook, IL, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: The efficacy and safety of enzalutamide (ENZA) monotherapy was assessed in hormone-naive men with prostate cancer (PC; any stage) eligible for androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). The primary end point of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (80% or more decline), assessed at 25 weeks (wks), was 92.5% with a median (range) maximum decrease of –99% (–100, –86.5) (Tombal et al. ASCO-GU 2013). Here we present data from the extended follow-up at 49 wks. Methods: In an open-label, single-arm phase II study, men age 18 or older with histologically confirmed PC requiring ADT, non-castrate testosterone (8 nmol/L or more), PSA 2 ng/mL or more at screening and a life expectancy of 12 months or more, received 160 mg ENZA once daily (NCT01302041). Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Secondary end points included changes in endocrine levels, metabolic parameters, bone mineral density (BMD), quality of life, and safety. Results: Sixty seven men were enrolled. Median (range) age was 73 (48 to 86); 38.8% had prior metastases; 35.8% and 23.94% had undergone prior prostatectomy and radiotherapy, respectively. Fifty nine men continued treatment beyond wk 25, and 54 completed wk 49. PSA response rate (80% or more reduction from baseline) at wk 49 was 80.6%, with a median (range) maximum decrease of –100% (–100, –86.5). Luteinizing hormone and testosterone were increased from baseline to wk 49 by 215.2% and 101.7%, respectively. Mean changes from baseline for metabolic outcomes at wk 49 were: +5.02% (total cholesterol), +8.86% (triglycerides), –3.54% (HbA1c), and +19.72% (HOMA-IR). Total body BMD was maintained at 49 wks (–0.30% from baseline). The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were gynecomastia (47.8%) and fatigue (38.8%). Seven men had serious AEs, none of which were drug related. Data on patient reported outcomes will be presented. Conclusions: ENZA monotherapy was associated with significant PSA reductions after 49 wks of treatment in men with hormone-naive PC. Endocrine changes and AEs were consistent with potent AR inhibition. Outcomes for all end points at 49 wks were consistent with those reported at 25 wks. Clinical trial information: NCT01302041.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01302041

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32, 2014 (suppl 4; abstr 62)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.4_suppl.62

Abstract #

62

Poster Bd #

D18

Abstract Disclosures