Liver metastases as predictors of outcome in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients (pts) treated with first-line sunitinib (SU) and sorafenib (SO).

Authors

null

Paolo Grassi

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy

Paolo Grassi , Elena Verzoni , Luca Porcu , Isabella Testa , Roberto Iacovelli , Enrico Garanzini , Roberto Salvioni , Filippo G. De Braud , Giuseppe Procopio

Organizations

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Milan, Italy

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: The predictive role of metastatic sites in RCC pts treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is unclear. Aim of this study was to investigate whether first line SU and SO was associated to metastatic sites in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods: A retrospective cohort of consecutive metastatic RCC (mRCC) pts treated with TKIs at Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan was analyzed. All pts received at least one targeted therapy including: SO, SU, bevacizumab plus interferon-alfa, pazopanib or temsirolimus. The product limit method was used to estimate survival functions and Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and to test statistical interaction between sub-groups identified by different metastatic sites. Results: 358 mRCC pts receiving first line TKIs between January 2005 and October 2012 were evaluated. Overall 206 pts (58%) received SO while 103 pts (29%) SU. Median duration of treatment for SU and SO groups was 16 (95%CI 12.0-20.1) and 9 months (mo) respectively (95%CI 7.0-12.0). After a median follow-up of 56.1 mo (range: 1.0-93.2) median OS for SO group was 19.9 mo (95%CI 16.0-25.1) while OS for SU group was not yet defined. Noteworthy 142 pts (69%) treated with SO received SU at disease progression (PD) while 36 pts (35%) received SO at SU failure. A statistically significant interaction between first line treatment and metastatic sites was found for the liver site in terms of PFS and OS (PFS p=0.034; OS p=0.004). SU was associated with a 18% [95%CI (-37%)- 123%] higher risk of PD as compared to SO in pts with liver mets while pts without liver mets showed a 46% [95%CI (-61%)-(-24%)] decreased risk of PD as compared to SO. SU was associated with a 40% [95%CI (-32%)-187%] higher risk of death as compared to SO in pts with liver mets while pts without liver mets showed a 62% [95%CI (-76%)-(-40%)] decreased risk of death as compared to SO. The predictive role of liver mets was confirmed introducing the Motzer score (PFS p=0.084; OS p=0.009). Conclusions: mRCC pts with liver mets treated with first line SO showed a better outcome as compared to SU while pts without liver mets treated with first line SO showed a worse outcome as compared to SU.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session C: Renal Cancer

Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Sub Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32, 2014 (suppl 4; abstr 536)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.4_suppl.536

Abstract #

536

Poster Bd #

J13

Abstract Disclosures