PECULIAR study: Phase II study of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced urothelial cancer.

Authors

Jae-Lyun Lee

Jae-Lyun Lee

Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

Jae-Lyun Lee , Se-Hoon Lee , Yoon Ji Choi , Jin-Hee Ahn , Cheryn Song , Bum-Sik Hong , Jun Hyuk Hong , Choung-Soo Kim , Hanjong Ahn

Organizations

Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea, Department of Oncology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea, Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Pemetrexed has demonstrated a favorable response with minimal toxicity when used as single agent as first-line and second-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma. The safety and tolerability of pemetrexed plus cisplatin combination has been widely recognized in malignant mesothelioma. This trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed plus cisplatin in advanced urothelial carcinoma. Methods: Eligible criteria included chemotherapy-naïve advanced urothelial carcinoma, ECOG PS 0-2 and measurable disease. Pemetrexed 500mg/m2 on day 1 with cisplatin 70 mg/m2on day 1 were administered every 3 weeks til disease progression or a maximal of 8 cycles. Primary endpoint was response rate (RR), and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicities. Response was evaluated every 6 weeks according to the RECIST criteria v.1.0 and toxicities were assessed with NCI CTCAE v.3.0. Results: A total of 42 patients were enrolled and 2 patients were excluded because of different histology and concomitant malignancy. At the time of this analysis, 36 patients (median age 66 years, ECOG 0-1 100%, visceral metastasis 50.0%, recurrent disease 61.1%) were evaluable; 6 patients were too early to assess. Twenty four partial responses for an overall response rate of 66.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 50.3-79.9%] were documented. Six patients had stable disease. The median PFS was estimated to be 6.9 months [95% CI 6.2-7.7 months]. The median OS was 16.3 months [95% CI 12.9-19.7 months]. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia in 33.3% of patients. No one experienced febrile neutropenia. Other grade 3 or 4 hematological and non-hematological toxicities were rarely observed (thrombocytopenia 6%, anemia 6%, transaminitis 6%, nausea 3%, anorexia 3%, edema 3%, dyspnea 3%). Conclusions: The combination of pemetrexed and cisplatin is very active, with an overall response rate of 66.7% and well tolerated in patients with advanced urothelial cancer. The final mature results will be presented in the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT01490437.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session B: Prostate, Penile, Urethral, and Testicular Cancers, and Urothelial Carcinoma

Track

Urothelial Carcinoma,Prostate Cancer,Penile, Urethral, and Testicular Cancers

Sub Track

Urothelial Carcinoma

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01490437

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32, 2014 (suppl 4; abstr 301)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.4_suppl.301

Abstract #

301

Poster Bd #

G7

Abstract Disclosures