Embolization versus embolization and systemic therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic disease: A retrospective analysis.

Authors

null

Sunnie Kim

Weill Medical College at Cornell University, New York, NY

Sunnie Kim , Karen T. Brown , Yuman Fong , Stephen Barnett Solomon , Joanne F. Chou , Marinela Capanu , James J. Harding , Eileen Mary O'Reilly , Leonard Saltz , Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa

Organizations

Weill Medical College at Cornell University, New York, NY, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) provides a survival benefit in a subset of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Even though data are lacking, patients with metastatic HCC (mHCC) are sometimes treated with transarterial therapies to address the hepatic disease. Sorafenib is a standard treatment for patients with mHCC. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients diagnosed with HCC who had undergone hepatic arterial embolization (HAE) between 2006 and until 2013. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from date of HAE to date of death and estimated by Kaplan Meier Methods. Patients alive at their last follow up date were censored. Results: Of 243 patients who had undergone HAE at MSKCC during the study period, 36 patients had mHCC on initial diagnosis. Of these, 22 received HAE only, while 14 received HAE plus systemic therapy at some time during their whole treatment course. Conclusions: Patients with mHCC who underwent HAE alone had a poor OS. These data suggest that there maybe a survival benefit in patients with mHCC treated with transarterial therapies add to systemic therapy that is given at some time during their whole treatment course. These results contrast with recent data on the use of combined modality in locally advanced disease. Further studies of combined modality therapy in the setting of mHCC may be warranted.

HAE (n=22) HAE + systemic (n=14)
Demographics
Median age (range) (years) 70 (57-79) 70 (58-75)
Gender n (%) male 18 (82) 14 (100)
Child-Pugh score n (%)
A 20 (91) 11 (79)
B 2 (9) 2 (14)
Unknown 1 (7)
Risk factors n (%)
Hepatitis B 4 (18) 6 (43)
Hepatitis C 7 (32)* 4 (28)
NASH 5 (23)*
Alcohol 5 (23)* 2 (14)
None 3 (14) 2 (14)
Okuda stage n (%)
1 12 (55) 9 (64)
2 10 (45) 5 (36)
Portal Vein Involvement n (%) 8 (36) 5 (36)
Number of involved mHCC sites n (%)
1-2 21 (95) 12 (86)
3 1 (5) 2 (14)
Outcomes
Median OS (CI) (months) 5.8 (4.1-11) 19.3 (3.7-66.7)
1-year survival (CI) (%) 18.5 (4.7-40) 57 (28-78)
3-year survival (CI) (%) 6.2 (0.4-24.3) 43 (17-66)

* 2 patients had 2 risk factors: alcohol plus NASH and alcohol plus Hepatitis C. Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session B: Cancers of the Pancreas, Small Bowel, and Hepatobiliary Tract

Track

Cancers of the Pancreas, Small Bowel, and Hepatobiliary Tract

Sub Track

Multidisciplinary Treatment

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32, 2014 (suppl 3; abstr 363)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.3_suppl.363

Abstract #

363

Poster Bd #

D22

Abstract Disclosures