Detection of potential actionable targets in appendiceal cancer detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), and mutational analysis.

Authors

null

Erkut Borazanci

Translational Genomics Research Institute - Virginia G Piper Cancer Center, Scottsdale, AZ

Erkut Borazanci , Jeffery Kimbrough , Jasgit C. Sachdev , Sherri Z. Millis , Samuel Ejadi , Ken Burnett , Stephanie Ratliff , Daniel D. Von Hoff , Ramesh K. Ramanathan

Organizations

Translational Genomics Research Institute - Virginia G Piper Cancer Center, Scottsdale, AZ, Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Appendiceal cancers are rare and there are no established guidelines for adjuvant treatment and metastatic disease. Methods: Samples were identified from > 60,000 global tumors analyzed at a referral molecular profiling CLIA certified laboratory (Caris Life Sciences) for biomarkers of drug sensitivity, under an approved protocol. 285 samples with primary tumor sites of appendix were identified (M/F ratio of 38%/62%; mean age of 55). Approximately 80% of samples were adenocarcinomas, 10% carcinoids, and 10% of indeterminate histology. IHC assays (n=273) were performed with up to 30 biomarkers; FISH (n=39) for c-Myc, cMET, EGFR, HER2 and/or TOPO2A gene copy amplifications; and sequencing done ( n= 223) for KRAS, EGFR, PIK3CA, and BRAF. Results: Targets on IHC: 97% high BCRP; 16% high KIT; 80% high COX-2; 50%high EGFR; 30% low MGMT, 81% high MRP1, 35% high PDGFR, 82% low PTEN, 27% high RRM1, 39% high SPARC; 67% high TLE3, 27% high TOPO2A ; 63% high TOPOI, and 99% negative TS. Targets on FISH: 5% amplified EGFR and 0% amplified Her2/Neu. Sequencing results: 53% mutated KRAS and 2% mutated BRAF. Conclusions: The high levels of drug resistance proteins (BCRP and MRP1) highlights the difficulty in treating these tumors. The incidence of KRAS mutations (53%) and low expression of TS (99%) is noteworthy, and points towards using 5FU/capecitabine as a backbone of therapy. Therapeutic options are varied and options include TOPO1 inhibitors (irinotecan/topotecan), EGFR inhibitors (erlotinib, cetuximab), PDGFR antagonists (regorafenib, axitinib), MGMT (temazolamide), BRAF inhibitors (vemurafenib, dabrafenib) and SPARC (nab-paclitaxel). These findings indicate the need to evaluate patient samples for patterns in marker expression and alteration, in order to better understand the molecular biology and formulate a personalized therapy approach in these difficult to treat cancers, and to pursue whole genomic sequencing. Supported by a grant from Caris Life Sciences.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session C: Cancers of the Colon and Rectum

Track

Cancers of the Colon, Rectum, and Anus

Sub Track

Translational Research

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32, 2014 (suppl 3; abstr 469)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.3_suppl.469

Abstract #

469

Poster Bd #

B32

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

The clinical and genomic characteristics of KRAS G12D mutated cancers.

First Author: Guomin Lin

Abstract

2023 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Circulating tumor DNA–based genomic landscape of KRAS wild-type pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

First Author: Brendon Fusco

First Author: David H Aggen