Mental health outcomes in a national sample of adult cancer survivors in the United States: Has psychosocial care improved?

Authors

null

Robin L. Whitney

University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA

Robin L. Whitney, Janice F. Bell, Jill G. Joseph, Richard J. Bold

Organizations

University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, University of California, Davis, Medical Center, Sacramento, CA

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Recent cancer care recommendations include routine mental health (MH) screening and support. We provide national estimates of psychological distress, MH visits, and unmet need (defined as having distress but no MH visit) for MH services among adult cancer survivors. Additionally, we test for temporal differences between years 2005 and 2010 to assess whether the estimates differ before and after important policy recommendations for psychosocial cancer care. Methods: This study analyzed cross-sectional data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), years 2005 and 2010, for adults (≥18yrs) in the United States (n=58,585) categorized as having: 1) no chronic disease; 2) chronic disease other than cancer; 3) cancer without co-morbid chronic disease; 4) cancer with co-morbid chronic disease. In these four groups we compared psychological distress, MH visits, and unmet need for MH services. Survey-weighted logistic regression was used to model the dependent variables as functions of disease status, socio-demographic variables and self-reported health status. Estimates are generalizable to the US civilian non-institutionalized population. Results: Compared to the group with no chronic disease, the cancer with co-morbid chronic disease group had the highest odds of psychological distress (OR 2.78; 95% CI: 2.18, 3.54) and MH visits (OR 1.7; 95% CI: 1.42, 2.05), with no change from 2005 to 2010. The other two groups (cancer without co-morbid chronic disease and chronic disease other than cancer) also had statistically significantly higher odds of both outcomes compared to those with no chronic disease. Among individuals with cancer, estimates of unmet need for MH services were significantly lower in 2010 (OR 1.53; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.88) compared to 2005 (OR 2.89; 95% CI: 2.09, 3.99). Conclusions: Individuals with cancer have disproportionate MH needs. We find evidence of MH care quality improvement among individuals with cancer between 2005 and 2010, a time period that coincides with continued policy and clinical attention to psychosocial needs in this population. These efforts appear to have reduced, but not eliminated, unmet need for MH services for individuals with cancer.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2013 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session A: Science of Quality

Track

Science of Quality,Health Reform: Implications for Costs and Quality ,Practice of Quality

Sub Track

Studies Using Registries or Combining Large Databases

Citation

J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl 31; abstr 120)

Abstract #

120

Poster Bd #

F20

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Michelle Payan

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship State of Survivorship Survey.

First Author: Shelley Fuld Nasso

First Author: Mark Liu