BRCA-1 promotor methylation as predictor of benefit from adjuvant CMF in triple-negative breast cancer not responsive to taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors

null

Rupert Bartsch

Department of Medicine I, Clinical Division of Oncology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Rupert Bartsch , Mathilde Födermayr , Miriam Sebesta , Margaretha Rudas , Anna Sophie Berghoff , Regina Promberger , Matthias Preusser , Peter Christian Dubsky , Florian Fitzal , Michael Gnant , Ansgar Weltermann , Christoph Zielinski , Guenther G. Steger , Otto Zach

Organizations

Department of Medicine I, Clinical Division of Oncology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, Hospital Elisabethinen Linz, Linz, Austria, Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, Department of Medicine I and Comprehensive Cancer Center CNS Tumours Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna and Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Vienna, Austria, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, Department of Medicine I and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria, Department of Medicine I, Clinical Division of Medical Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients (pts) without pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have an unfavourable prognosis. ABCSG trials 14 and 24 defined 6 cycles of epirubicin/docetaxel (+/- capecitabine) as active NAC regimen; pts without pCR commonly received another 4-8 cycles of adjuvant CMF. Different studies suggested that breast tumours harbouring BRCA-1 germline mutations were resistant to taxane-based therapy while sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents was retained. BRCA-1 mutations are rare in sporadic BC; BRCA-1 promotor methylation (PM), however, is frequently observed. We hypothesized that pts with TNBC harbouring BRCA1 PM would benefit from adjuvant CMF salvage therapy. Methods: For this analysis, we included all pts with TNBC refractory to taxane-based NAC who received adjuvant CMF. DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples, purified and bisulfite-converted. The TaqMan assay was used in order to perform a quantitative methylation-specific PCR. Actin-b was used as reference gene to normalise the amount of provided DNA; bisulfite-converted, artificially methylated DNA was used as positive control. Results: Twenty-four pts, median age 47 years, were available for this analysis. In 9/24 pts (37.5%), BRCA-1 PM was detected. At a median follow-up of 27.5 months, 1/9 pts (11.1%) with BRCA-1 PM had a disease-free survival (DFS) event, as compared to 10/15 (66.6%) in the non-methylated group (p = 0.013; Fisher’s exact test). Kaplan Meier estimation of DFS in the non-methylated group was 24 months (95% CI 14.06-33.94) and was not reached in the methylated group (n.s.). Conclusions: In TNBC refractory to taxane-based NAC, adjuvant CMF is of limited efficacy. In tumours harbouring BRCA-1 PM, however, a significant decrease of DFS events was observed. Therefore, tumours harbouring defects in genetic repair mechanism might be exceptionally sensitive to drugs causing DNA-damage. Further clinical investigation of this concept is warranted.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2013 Breast Cancer Symposium

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

General Session VIII: Poster Discussion B

Track

Risk Assessment, Prevention, Detection, and Screening,Systemic Therapy,Local/Regional Therapy,Survivorship and Health Policy

Sub Track

Triple-Negative

Citation

J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl 26; abstr 148)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2013.31.26_suppl.148

Abstract #

148

Poster Bd #

B6

Abstract Disclosures