Prognostic value of HER2 on breast cancer survival.

Authors

null

Nora Katzorke

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany

Nora Katzorke , Brigitte Kathrin Rack , Lothar Haeberle , Julia Katharina Neugebauer , Carola Anna Melcher , Carsten Hagenbeck , Helmut Forstbauer , Hans Ulrich Ulmer , Ulrike Soeling , Rolf Kreienberg , Tanja N. Fehm , Andreas Schneeweiss , Matthias W. Beckmann , Peter A. Fasching , Wolfgang Janni

Organizations

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany, Department of Gynecology and Obstetric, Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany, Onkologie Troisdorf, Troisdorf, Germany, Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany, Onkologie Kassel, Kassel, Germany, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics University Ulm, Ulm, Germany, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: HER2 overexpression and overamplification have originally been described as a prognostic factor indicating a poor prognosis. However the highly effective anti-HER2 treatment was approved in 2006 after several large randomized trials showing that the prognosis in HER2 positive women could be improved. Few data has been generated comparing HER2 positive patients treated with trastuzumab with comparable HER2 negative patients. Aim of this analysis was to investigate the prognostic relevance of HER2 status in a post trastuzumab approval study. Methods: The SUCCESS trial is an open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled, phase III study comparing FEC-docetaxel (Doc) vs. FEC-Doc-gemcitabine (Doc-G) regime and 2 vs. 5 year treatment with zoledronat in 3754 patients with primary breast cancer (N+ or high risk). All patients were treated per protocol with trastuzumab, if HER2 status was shown to be positive by local pathology. Furthermore HER2 status was a stratification factor. The prognostic value of HER2 status with respect to overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), disregarding the above stated treatment arms, was studied with Cox proportional hazards regression models in univariate as well as multivariate analyses adjusted for age, BMI, tumor size, nodal status, grading, estrogen receptor status and progesterone receptor status. Results: 2628 patients were included into this analysis. Median Follow up time was 4.8 years, 221 deaths and 412 recurrences were recorded until data base closure. HER2 was not a prognostic factor in the univariate analysis (OS: HR= 0.86, 95% CI: 0.63 to 1.19; PFS: HR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.76 to 1.19). In the multivariate analysis all of the above stated prognostic factors were of prognostic relevance. HER2 was of prognostic relevance with a HR of 0.67 (OS, 95% CI: 0.48 to 0.92) and 0.79 (PFS, 95% CI: 0.62 to 0.99) indicating that patients with a positive HER2 status had a better prognosis. Conclusions: Patients treated with trastuzumab showed a more favourable prognosis compared to HER2 negative patients in this prospectively randomized trial, possibly due to the therapeutic effect of HER2-targeted treatment.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2013 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer - HER2/ER

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

HER2+

Citation

J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl; abstr 640)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.640

Abstract #

640

Poster Bd #

13G

Abstract Disclosures