In vitro and in vivo activity of regorafenib (REGO) in drug-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST).

Authors

null

Cesar Serrano-Garcia

Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Cesar Serrano-Garcia , Michael C. Heinrich , Meijun Zhu , Chandrajit P. Raut , Grant Eilers , Gloria Ravegnini , George D. Demetri , Sebastian Bauer , Jonathan A. Fletcher , Suzanne George

Organizations

Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Portland VA Medical Center and Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, Division of Surgical Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: KIT and PDGFRA mutations (mut) are the crucial transforming events in most GISTs, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with activity against KIT and PDGFRA, such as imatinib (IM) (front-line therapy) and sunitinib (SU) (second-line therapy), are effective treatments in GIST patients (pts). Resistance to IM and SU is commonly associated with evolution of secondary kinase mut. REGO is a multi-targeted TKI that inhibits KIT, PDGFR, and other oncologic targets and has recently shown benefit in pts with metastatic GIST after progression on standard treatments. We evaluated the in vitro and in vivo activity of REGO compared with IM, SU, and sorafenib (SOR) (a multi-TKI structurally related to REGO). Methods: REGO, IM, SU, and SOR inhibition of viability and KIT phosphorylation was assessed in human GIST cell lines and in Ba/F3 cells transformed by KIT oncoproteins with IM-resistant ATP binding pocket or activation-loop mut. KIT/PDGFRA genotyping was performed in GISTs responding or progressing on REGO in the academic phase II clinical trial. Results: In GISTs with KIT exon 11 mutant oncoproteins, REGO potently inhibited viability, KIT phosphorylation, and downstream effector phosphorylation (AKT, MAPK, S6). IM-resistant activation loop mut were more potently inhibited by REGO than SU, whereas the gatekeeper IM-resistant mut T670I was inhibited by both REGO and SU, and the common ATP-binding pocket mutant V654A was more potently inhibited by SU than REGO. Two GIST metastases progressing in one pt after initial response to REGO contained KIT V654A mut. SOR and REGO demonstrated comparable in vitro overall activity. Representative GIST cell line viability IC50s are shown in the Table (values in bold indicate expected clinical relevance). Conclusions: In vitro studies confirm REGO is a potent inhibitor of KIT exon 11 mut in GIST and appears to have stronger activity than SU against the most common KIT activation-loop mut observed in GIST. Ongoing clinical correlative analyses from REGO-treated study patients will be presented.

IC50 (nM)
Cell line KIT mutation REGO SU IM
GIST-T1 KIT ex 11 110 15 30
GIST-T1/816 KIT ex 11 + D816E 395 3,111 604
GIST430 KIT ex 11 191 68 61
GIST430/654 KIT ex 11 +V654A 3,341 194 3,128

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2013 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Sarcoma

Track

Sarcoma

Sub Track

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST)

Citation

J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl; abstr 10510)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.10510

Abstract #

10510

Poster Bd #

3

Abstract Disclosures