Utility of standardized letters in assisting primary care providers (PCPs) with the care of cancer survivors (CS).

Authors

null

Ali Moghaddamjou

University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Ali Moghaddamjou , Caroline Speers , Winson Y. Cheung

Organizations

University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Survivorship care plans have strong face validity, but individualizing plans to each patient’s needs can be resource intensive. At our institution, a 1-page standardized letter that outlines the essential components of follow-up care is mailed to PCPs at the time of a patient’s discharge. This letter highlights the recommended frequency and interval of tests and physician visits. Our study aims were to 1) characterize PCPs’ attitudes regarding these letters and 2) identify potential strategies to improve this channel of communication with PCPs. Methods: Self-administered surveys were mailed to high-volume PCPs in British Columbia, defined as those whose practices followed >/=5 breast or colorectal CS in the preceding year. The survey asked about practice characteristics and PCPs’ views towards the content and format of these standardized letters. Logistic regression models were constructed to delineate factors associated with follow-up preferences. Results: Among 787 PCPs, 507 (64%) responded: median year since graduation was 27 (range 1-62), 67% were men, 38% had a faculty appointment, 71% practiced in a group, and 92% were paid fee-for-service. When asked about their perspectives regarding the care of CS, 388 (77%) indicated they were comfortable providing follow-up with 299 (74%) reporting that the standardized letter contained adequate information. In regression models, PCPs who were comfortable with cancer surveillance and those who graduated greater than 30 years ago were more likely to view the standardized letter as useful (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.41-4.43 and OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.24-4.33, respectively) and important (OR 4.07, 95% CI 1.80-9.19 and OR 3.14, 95% CI 1.01-9.74, respectively). Among 103 (26%) PCPs who found the letter to be insufficient, most wanted additional details about the cancer diagnosis (88%), specific information on the toxicities of therapy (88%), and the estimated risk of recurrence (84%). Conclusions: Most PCPS were satisfied with a simple, standardized letter that outlines the necessary components of cancer follow-up. PCPs with less familiarity with cancer surveillance may be a target group that benefits most from individualized survivorship care plans.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2013 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Patient and Survivor Care

Track

Patient and Survivor Care

Sub Track

Survivorship

Citation

J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl; abstr 9593)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.9593

Abstract #

9593

Poster Bd #

34E

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship State of Survivorship Survey.

First Author: Shelley Fuld Nasso

First Author: Michelle Payan

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Description of survivorship recommendations in NCCN guidelines.

First Author: Andrea Anampa-Guzmán