Randomized phase II trial of extended versus standard neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer, NCCTG (Alliance) trial N0849.

Authors

null

Steven R. Alberts

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Steven R. Alberts , Gamini S. Soori , Qian Shi , Dennis A. Wigle , Robert P. Sticca , Robert Clell Miller , James L. Leenstra , Patrick J. Peller , Tsung-Teh Wu , Harry H. Yoon , Timothy F. Drevyanko , Stephen Ko , Bassam Ibrahim Mattar , Daniel A. Nikcevich , Robert J. Behrens , Maged F. Khalil , George P. Kim

Organizations

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium, Omaha, NE, Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Rochester, MN, Meritcare Hospital CCOP, Fargo, ND, St. Vincent Regional Cancer Center CCOP, Green Bay, WI, Iowa Oncology Research Association CCOP, Des Moines, IA, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, Wichita Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita, KS, Essentia Health Duluth Clinic CCOP, Duluth, MN, Iowa Oncology Research Association, Des Moines, IA, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA

Research Funding

NIH

Background: Patients (pts) with locally advanced esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma commonly receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (chemo-RT). Despite this approach the rate of recurrence remains high. Given the difficulties of postoperative therapy, the efficacy of extended neoadjuvant therapy was assessed. Methods: Eligibility criteria included T3-4,N0 – Tany,N(+) disease amenable to radiation and surgery. Pts were randomized to either arm A (docetaxel 60 mg/m2 day 1 , oxaliplatin [Oxal] 85 mg/m2 day 1, and capecitabine 1250 mg/m2/day days 1-14 x 2 cycles [DOC] followed by 5-FU 180 mg/m2/day continuous IV through radiation + Oxal 85 mg/m2 days 1,15,29 + 50.4 Gy radiation (chemo-RT)) or arm B (chemo-RT alone). Randomization was stratified by ECOG PS (0/1 vs 2) and stage (II vs III/IVA). Primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (PCR) rate, defined as no gross or microscopic tumor identified in the surgical specimen. Interim analysis assessed efficacy and futility of the experimental intervention. Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare clinical/pathologic factors between arms. Results: Baseline and stratification factors were well balanced between arms. Of 42 pts included in the interim analysis (86% male; age [median 63, range 38-88], 100% PS 0/1; 71% stage III; 55% esophagus, 40% GEJ; 36% measurable disease), 4 and 1 pts in arms A and B, respectively, did not have surgery due to death (A, 2), progressive disease (A, 1), alternative treatment (A, 1) or adverse event (B, 1). Among 21 arm A pts, 21, 20, and 19 pts started 1st cycle of DOC, 2nd cycle of DOC and chemo-RT, respectively. All arm B pts received chemo-RT. 33% (7/21) of arm A and 48% (10/21) of arm B pts achieved PCR (p=0.53). Among pts undergoing surgery, 94% (16/17) and 100% (20/20) of arm A and B pts had complete resection (p=0.46). 38% and 24% of arm A and B pts experienced at least one grade 4+ adverse event at least possibly related to treatment (p=0.51). Conclusions: Extended neoadjuvant therapy in pts with locally advanced esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinoma failed to improve the PCR rate. Follow-up in regard to survival and rate of recurrence is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT00938470.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2013 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Esophageal or Gastric Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00938470

Citation

J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl; abstr 4026)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.4026

Abstract #

4026

Poster Bd #

18

Abstract Disclosures