Prognostic impact of estrogen receptor (ER) level changes during progression for patients with both ER-positive (ER+) primary breast cancer and paired recurrence.

Authors

null

Maria Vittoria Dieci

Department of Oncology, Hematology and Respiratory Diseases, Modena University Hospital, Modena, Italy

Maria Vittoria Dieci , Elena Barbieri , Aicha Goubar , Fabrice Andre , Claudia Omarini , Stefania Raffaella Bettelli , Federico Piacentini , Guido Ficarra , Pier Franco Conte , Valentina Guarneri

Organizations

Department of Oncology, Hematology and Respiratory Diseases, Modena University Hospital, Modena, Italy, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France, Department of Pathology, Modena University Hospital, Modena, Italy, Department of Oncology, Hematology, and Respiratory Diseases, Modena University Hospital, Modena, Italy, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, University of Padova, Padova, Italy

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: We have previously reported that ER+ breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) who become ER-negative at relapse have a poorer overall survival (OS) as compared to those still ER+ at relapse [Dieci et al., Ann Oncol 2013]. Our aim is to evaluate whether, among the group of patients with an ER+ status on both primary and recurrence, changes in the level of ER expression may be of prognostic value. Methods: A total of 81 pts with ER+ primary BC and ER+ paired recurrence who underwent relapse biopsy at Modena University Hospital were studied. ER status was assessed by IHC and the cutoff for ER-positivity was >=10%. Samples were defined as ER-high (>50%) and ER-low (>=10% and <=50%). HER2-status was defined according to IHC and/or FISH results. OS was calculated as the time interval between primary BC diagnosis and death or last follow up. Results: Biopsied recurrences were: distant (86%) and local relapses (14%). Fifteen percent of primary and 21% of recurrent tumors were HER2-positive. Sixty-two pts maintained the same ER level (i.e. high or low) on both primary and relapse (ER-level concordant), whereas 19 changed from ER-high to ER-low or viceversa (ER-level discordant). No difference in OS was observed between the ER-level concordant and the ER-level discordant groups (p=0.3). However, we identified those pts whose ER-high primary BC turned into ER-low as having a particularly poor outcome. Indeed, 10yrs-OS rates were 51% for the ER-level concordant group, 50% for pts changing from ER-low to ER-high and 14% for pts changing from ER-high to ER-low (p=0.0019). Finally, we focused on the subset of pts starting from an ER-high primary BC and showing an ER+/HER2-negative phenotype on both primary and relapse (n=51). The drop of ER-level expression below the 50% cut-off at relapse was confirmed as a poor prognostic factor, as compared to pts maintaining an ER-high level (10yrs-OS 53% vs 17%, p=0.0063). Conclusions: We demonstrated that, even in the case of maintenance of the same single-receptor status (ER+) and/or tumor phenotype (ER+/HER2-negative) between primary BC and recurrence, relapse biopsy may provide relevant prognostic information.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2013 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer - HER2/ER

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

ER+

Citation

J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl; abstr 556)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.556

Abstract #

556

Poster Bd #

3C

Abstract Disclosures