Hematology & Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
Katja C. Weisel , Meletios A. Dimopoulos , Philippe Moreau , Martha Lacy , Kevin W. Song , Michel Delforge , Lionel Karlin , Hartmut Goldschmidt , Anne Banos , Albert Oriol Rocafiguera , Xin Yu , Lars Sternas , Christian Jacques , Mohamed H. Zaki , Jesùs F. San-Miguel
Background: Pts who have exhausted lenalidomide (LEN) and bortezomib (BORT) treatment (Tx) have a poor prognosis. A significant proportion of pts have RI with increasing incidence during disease course. POM + LoDEX has demonstrated efficacy in pts with prior LEN and BORT, including those with RI. MM-003 is an open-label, multicenter, phase 3 trial comparing POM + LoDEX vs HiDEX in RRMM pts who failed LEN and BORT and progressed on their last Tx. Methods: Pts must have failed LEN and BORT after ≥ 2 consecutive cycles of each (alone or in combination) and must have been refractory to last prior Tx (progressive disease [PD] during Tx or within 60 days). Pts with creatinine clearance (CrCl) < 45 mL/min were excluded. Randomization was 2:1 to POM 4 mg D1–21 + DEX 40 mg (20 mg for pts aged > 75 y) qw; or DEX 40 mg (20 mg for pts aged > 75 y) D1–4, 9–12, and 17–20 (28-D cycles). Tx continued until PD or unacceptable adverse event (AE). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and AEs. This analysis examined pts with or without moderate RI (CrCl < 60 vs ≥ 60mL/min). Results: 302 pts received POM + LoDEX; 153 pts received HiDEX, 31% and 39% had moderate RI, respectively. Pts with moderate RI were more likely to be older (64% vs 36% aged > 65 y) vs no RI. Median follow-up was 4 mo. Median PFS and OS were significantly longer with POM + LoDEX vs HiDEX regardless of RI (Table). Similar AE rates for POM + LoDEX as well as HiDEX Tx were seen in pts with and without moderate RI (Table). Discontinuation due to AE was 5% vs 7% (no moderate RI) and 11% vs 5% (moderate RI). Conclusions: POM + LoDEX significantly extended PFS and OS vs HiDEX in pts with or without moderate RI. Tolerability of POM + LoDEX was acceptable across subgroups, with few discontinuations due to AE. Clinical trial information: NCT01311687.
CrCl | ≥ 60 mL/min |
< 60 mL/min |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POM + LoDEX | HiDEX | HR (P) | POM + LoDEX | HiDEX | HR (P) | |
Efficacy (mo) | ||||||
Median PFS | 3.7 | 1.8 | 0.47 (<.001) | 3.2 | 1.6 | 0.44 (< .001) |
Median OS | Not reached | 9.2 | 0.57 (.021) | 10.3 | 4.6 | 0.51 (.008) |
Grade 3/4 AEs (%) | ||||||
Neutropenia | 41 | 15 | — | 44 | 15 | — |
Anemia | 24 | 26 | — | 33 | 34 | — |
Infection | 23 | 23 | — | 28 | 24 | — |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Cyrille Touzeau
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Darrell White
2016 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Philippe Moreau
2013 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Hartmut Goldschmidt