Pharmacodynamic and efficacy analysis of the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib (GSK436) in combination with the MEK inhibitor trametinib (GSK212) in patients with BRAFV600 mutant colorectal cancer (CRC).

Authors

null

Ryan Bruce Corcoran

Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA

Ryan Bruce Corcoran , Gerald Steven Falchook , Jeffrey R. Infante , Omid Hamid , Wells A. Messersmith , Adil Daud , Eunice Lee Kwak , David P. Ryan , Razelle Kurzrock , Chloe Evelyn Atreya , Jennifer Luan , Peng Sun , Megan Schaeffer , Monica Motwani , Maureen R Bleam , Christopher H Moy , Kiran Patel , Keith W. Orford , Scott Kopetz , Alan Paul Venook

Organizations

Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, SCRI/Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA, Department of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, GlaxoSmithKline, Oncology R&D, Collegeville, PA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: TheBRAF V600 mutation occurs in 5-10% of metastatic CRC, predicts poor prognosis, and may predict lack of response to standard therapy. The combination of inhibitors of BRAF (dabrafenib; D) and MEK (trametinib; T) has shown significant efficacy in BRAF-mutant melanoma. The safety, efficacy, and pharmacodynamic effects of this combination were studied in BRAF-mutant CRC patients (pts). Methods: BRAF mutant CRC pts were enrolled to an initial efficacy cohort of 26 pts and a subsequent pharmacodynamic (PD) expansion cohort that included biopsies of 15 pts at screening and at steady state. So far, 36 pts have enrolled, including 10 in the PD cohort. Eligible pts had previously-treated BRAFV600E mutant stage IV CRC. Pts were treated with D (150mg BID) and T (2mg QD). Additional analyses were performed on available archival tissues. Results: Data are available for 36 pts: ECOG performance status 0 (58%) or 1 (42%), 81% had received ≥ 2 prior chemotherapy regimens, 36% had received prior EGFR inhibitor treatment, and 83% had ≥ 1 biologic therapy. Among 34 pts with >1 restaging assessment as of November 2012, 1 (3%) achieved a complete response (confirmed, on study >12m), 3 (9%) achieved a partial response (1 confirmed to date), and 18 (53%) had stable disease (SD). Minor responses were seen in 7/18 pts (39%) with SD. Median PFS was 3.5 mo (95% CI: 1.8-4.9); overall duration on study range: 0.03–15.2 mo 7 pts (24%) remained on study for ≥6 cycles with 9 pts still on study. The most frequent AEs, any grade, included pyrexia (67%), nausea (56%), fatigue (53%), chills (47%), vomiting (39%), headache (31%), peripheral edema (31%), anemia (28%), and decreased appetite (28%). 2 pts (6%) discontinued due to AEs. Decreased pERK staining vs pre-dose samples was seen in all post-dose samples leading to absolute (49% ±29%) and relative (69% ±28%, normalized to total ERK) reduction in pERK. Conclusions: Further investigation is needed, as this combination is tolerable at full monotherapy doses of each drug, with manageable toxicities, and has activity in a subset of BRAF mutant pts. Updated safety, efficacy, and correlative data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT01072175.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2013 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Colorectal Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01072175

Citation

J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl; abstr 3507)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.3507

Abstract #

3507

Abstract Disclosures