Randomized phase II trial of cixutumumab (CIX) alone or with cetuximab (CET) for refractory recurrent/metastatic squamous cancer of head and neck (R/M-SCCHN).

Authors

null

Bonnie S. Glisson

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Bonnie S. Glisson , Jennifer Tseng , Shanthi Marur , Dong M Shin , Barbara A. Murphy , Ezra E.W. Cohen , Christopher Y. Thomas , Richard Willey , Jan Cosaert , William Nassib William , Nusrat Harun , J. Jack Lee , Robert I. Haddad

Organizations

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Orlando, Orlando, FL, The Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, The Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, Deptartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, ImClone Systems LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company, Bridgewater, NJ, Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Preclinical evidence supports clinical investigation of IGF-1R inhibitors alone, or combined with EGFR inhibitors, in SCCHN patients (pts). CIX and CET monoclonal antibodies block ligand binding to IGF-1R and EGFR, respectively. CIX mono and CIX+CET combo were studied in pts with chemotherapy-refractory R/M-SCCHN. Methods: This open-label phase II trial randomized 97 pts with R/M-SCCHN, ECOG PS 0-2 and disease progression following (<90 days) platinum-based chemotherapy, to CIX 10 mg/kg alone (Arm A) or with CET 500 mg/m2 (Arm B) every 2 wks. Time to recurrence from last anti-EGFR exposure had to be >90 days; pts were stratified by prior CET exposure. Primary endpoint was median PFS (RECIST assessments every 8 wks). Efficacy endpoints in the CET-naïve patients, immunohistochemical analysis of 10 relevant markers on tumor specimens, and cytokine/angiogenic factor profiling of blood samples obtained serially through treatment were also examined. Results: 47 Arm A and 44 arm B pts were treated: median age: 60.0 y (35 - 81), PS 0/1/2: 17.6%/62.6%/19.8%, male (80.2%), tumors originating mainly from oropharynx (67.1%), supraglottic (9.9%) and oral cavity (13.2%), with 33% moderately and 36.3% poorly differentiated tumors, previous therapy: 98.9% chemotherapy and 82.4% radiotherapy indicating no baseline differences. Most common tx-emergent AEs were fatigue (55.3 vs. 61.4%), dermatitis acneiform (6.4 vs 63.6%), nausea (29.8 vs. 34.1%), weight decreased (25.5 vs. 29.5%), hyperglycemia (25.5% vs. 29.5%), vomiting (21.3 vs. 20.5%), and headache (17 vs. 25%). Efficacy: See Table. Conclusions: Targeting IGF-1R alone with CIX or co-targeting IGF-1R and EGFR with CIX and CET did not result in improved PFS compared to historical data with CET alone in patients with chemotherapy-refractory R/M-SCCHN. The results of this study do not support CIX single-agent activity in this patient population. Therapy on both arms was feasible. There was no apparent exacerbation of CET toxicity by concurrent CIX exposure. Clinical trial information: NCT00617734.

Endpoint CIX CIX+CET
Median PFS/OS months 1.9/5.3 2.0/5.5
6-month PFS 5.9% 15.3%
Clinical benefit (CR/PR/SD) 19% (2%/0%/17%) 38% (2%/7%/30%)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2013 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Head and Neck Cancer

Track

Head and Neck Cancer

Sub Track

Head and Neck Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00617734

Citation

J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl; abstr 6030)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.6030

Abstract #

6030

Poster Bd #

19

Abstract Disclosures