The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
James M. G. Larkin , Michele Del Vecchio , Paolo Antonio Ascierto , Jacob Schachter , Claus Garbe , Bart Neyns , Mario Mandala , Paul Lorigan , Wilson H Miller , Alexander David Guminski , Carola Berking , Piotr Rutkowski , Paola Queirolo , Axel Hauschild , Ana Maria Arance , Michael Paul Brown , Lada Mitchell , Maria Luisa Veronese , Christian U. Blank
Background: Vemurafenib (VEM), a BRAF kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated high response rates and improved progression-free and overall survival in pts with BRAFV600mutation–positive metastatic melanoma (mM). We present interim results from predefined subgroups from a large multicenter, open-label safety study of VEM in pts with mM (NCT01307397). Methods: Pts with BRAFV600mutation–positive histologically confirmed mM received VEM (960 mg BID) as first-line therapy or subsequent to previous therapies. Assessments for safety and efficacy were made every 28 days. Results: As of Feb 29, 2012, 2,265 pts have received VEM. Pts had a median age of 54.0 (13-95) yrs and median time since diagnosis of mM of 6.2 (0-351.9) mos. 59% had received prior systemic therapy. Median time of exposure to VEM as of the cut-off date was 3 (0.03-11.24) mos for the overall population and majority of subgroups, and approximately 2.5 mos for pts with ECOG ≥2 and age ≥75 yrs. 1537 (68%) pts were still receiving VEM at the cut-off date. 728 (32%) pts discontinued, most frequently because of PD (538/728 pts; 74%). Adverse events (AEs) were reported for 87% of all patients, with arthralgia (32%) and rash (26%) the most frequent. The incidences of AEs in the subgroups are summarized (Table). Although efficacy analyses are limited by the short duration of follow-up, six-month OS rate was 76% (95% CI 72-79%) and median PFS was 4.1 mos (95% CI 3.9-4.5 mos). Postbaseline tumor assessments were available for 63% and 30% of pts at wk 8 and 16, respectively. At wk 8 CR: 2%, PR: 57%, SD: 30%, PD: 6%. At wk 16 CR: 3%, PR: 46%, SD: 31%, PD: 15%. Conclusions: Although the overall safety profile of VEM in this study was consistent with previous clinical data, interim analyses of subgroups suggest that very elderly pts may be at higher risk of G3 AEs. Clinical trial information: NCT01307397.
Subgroups | N | AEs, % (95% CI) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
G3 | G4 | Leading to withdrawal | ||
Overall | 2,265 | 31 (29-33) | 2 (1-3) | 4 (3-5) |
BM No Yes |
1,673 555 |
30 (28-32) 35 (31-39) |
1 (1-2) 3 (2-5) |
4 (3-5) 4 (3-6) |
LDH Normal | 1,037 | 31 (28-33) | 2 (1-3) | 3 (2-4) |
Elevated | 1,159 | 32 (29-35) | 2 (2-4) | 5 (3-6) |
ECOG 0-1 | 1,992 | 31 (29-33) | 2 (1-2) | 3 (3-4) |
≥2 | 236 | 37 (31-43) | 4 (2-7) | 7 (4-11) |
Prior ipilimumab | 236 | 40 (34-46) | 4 (2-7) | 3 (1-5) |
Age (yrs) <75 | 2,089 | 30 (28-32) | 2 (1-3) | 3 (3-4) |
≥75 | 176 | 44 (36-51) | 2 (1-6) | 13 (8-18) |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Dirk Schadendorf
2018 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Brigitte Dreno
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Julia Elizabeth Lai-Kwon
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Daniel Olson