Open-label, multicenter safety study of vemurafenib in patients with BRAFV600 mutation–positive metastatic melanoma.

Authors

null

James M. G. Larkin

The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom

James M. G. Larkin , Michele Del Vecchio , Paolo Antonio Ascierto , Jacob Schachter , Claus Garbe , Bart Neyns , Mario Mandala , Paul Lorigan , Wilson H Miller , Alexander David Guminski , Carola Berking , Piotr Rutkowski , Paola Queirolo , Axel Hauschild , Ana Maria Arance , Michael Paul Brown , Lada Mitchell , Maria Luisa Veronese , Christian U. Blank

Organizations

The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom, Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione, Naples, Italy, Ella Institute for Melanoma, Division of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel, Universität Tübingen – Hautklinik, Tübingen, Germany, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium, Papa Giovanni XXIII, Division of Medical Oncology, Unit of Clinical and Translational Research, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Bergamo, Italy, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom, Lady Davis Institute and Segal Cancer Center, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, Melanoma Institute of Australia, Sydney, Australia, Department of Dermatology, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland, Department of Medical Oncology A, National Institute for Cancer Research, Genoa, Italy, Universitäts-Hautklinik Kiel, Kiel, Germany, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland, Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Vemurafenib (VEM), a BRAF kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated high response rates and improved progression-free and overall survival in pts with BRAFV600mutation–positive metastatic melanoma (mM). We present interim results from predefined subgroups from a large multicenter, open-label safety study of VEM in pts with mM (NCT01307397). Methods: Pts with BRAFV600mutation–positive histologically confirmed mM received VEM (960 mg BID) as first-line therapy or subsequent to previous therapies. Assessments for safety and efficacy were made every 28 days. Results: As of Feb 29, 2012, 2,265 pts have received VEM. Pts had a median age of 54.0 (13-95) yrs and median time since diagnosis of mM of 6.2 (0-351.9) mos. 59% had received prior systemic therapy. Median time of exposure to VEM as of the cut-off date was 3 (0.03-11.24) mos for the overall population and majority of subgroups, and approximately 2.5 mos for pts with ECOG ≥2 and age ≥75 yrs. 1537 (68%) pts were still receiving VEM at the cut-off date. 728 (32%) pts discontinued, most frequently because of PD (538/728 pts; 74%). Adverse events (AEs) were reported for 87% of all patients, with arthralgia (32%) and rash (26%) the most frequent. The incidences of AEs in the subgroups are summarized (Table). Although efficacy analyses are limited by the short duration of follow-up, six-month OS rate was 76% (95% CI 72-79%) and median PFS was 4.1 mos (95% CI 3.9-4.5 mos). Postbaseline tumor assessments were available for 63% and 30% of pts at wk 8 and 16, respectively. At wk 8 CR: 2%, PR: 57%, SD: 30%, PD: 6%. At wk 16 CR: 3%, PR: 46%, SD: 31%, PD: 15%. Conclusions: Although the overall safety profile of VEM in this study was consistent with previous clinical data, interim analyses of subgroups suggest that very elderly pts may be at higher risk of G3 AEs. Clinical trial information: NCT01307397.

Subgroups N AEs, % (95% CI)
G3 G4 Leading to withdrawal
Overall 2,265 31 (29-33) 2 (1-3) 4 (3-5)
BM No
Yes
1,673
555
30 (28-32)
35 (31-39)
1 (1-2)
3 (2-5)
4 (3-5)
4 (3-6)
LDH Normal 1,037 31 (28-33) 2 (1-3) 3 (2-4)
Elevated 1,159 32 (29-35) 2 (2-4) 5 (3-6)
ECOG 0-1 1,992 31 (29-33) 2 (1-2) 3 (3-4)
≥2 236 37 (31-43) 4 (2-7) 7 (4-11)
Prior ipilimumab 236 40 (34-46) 4 (2-7) 3 (1-5)
Age (yrs) <75 2,089 30 (28-32) 2 (1-3) 3 (3-4)
≥75 176 44 (36-51) 2 (1-6) 13 (8-18)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2013 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Track

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Sub Track

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01307397

Citation

J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl; abstr 9046)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.9046

Abstract #

9046

Poster Bd #

45A

Abstract Disclosures