Relationship of baseline PSA and degree of PSA decline to radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) in patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Results from COU-AA-302.

Authors

Charles Ryan

Charles J. Ryan

Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

Charles J. Ryan , Anil Londhe , Arturo Molina , Matthew R. Smith , Johann Sebastian De Bono , Peter Mulders , Dana E. Rathkopf , Fred Saad , Christopher Logothetis , Karim Fizazi , Howard I. Scher , Eric Jay Small , Shannon Matheny , Thian San Kheoh , Thomas W. Griffin

Organizations

Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Raritan, NJ, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Los Angeles, CA, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, The Institute of Cancer Research, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Sud, Villejuif, France

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Abiraterone acetate (AA), an androgen biosynthesis inhibitor, prolongs overall survival (OS) in mCRPC patients and is approved for use in this population. The relationship of PSA kinetics to rPFS was evaluated in an exploratory analysis of patients from COU-AA-302, a randomized phase III study of AA in chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients. Methods: 1,088 patients were randomized 1:1 to AA (1 g) + prednisone (P) (5 mg BID) or P alone. rPFS and OS were co-primary endpoints. rPFS was defined as time to first occurrence of bone scan progression by PCWG2 criteria, progression by CT/MRI by modified RECIST 1.0 criteria, or death from any cause; PSA changes were not a factor in determining rPFS. Quartiles of baseline PSA and % PSA decrease from baseline to nadir were analyzed. Stratified Cox regression models were used with factors for treatment, PSA outcomes, and baseline covariates performed at 55% of OS events. Results: 54/546 patients (10%) in AA + P arm achieved undetectable PSA vs 14/542 patients (3%) in the P arm; at median follow-up of 27.1 mos, radiographic progression was observed in 28% (AA + P) vs 50% of patients (P). There was a consistent trend of decreasing hazard of progression with decreasing baseline PSA and increasing % PSA decline (Table). Treatment effect of AA + P vs P with decreasing baseline PSA or % PSA decline remained significant (p=0.001) after adjusting for other factors (PSA, LDH, alk phos, hemoglobin, bone metastasis) in the model. Conclusions: rPFS was positively associated with the magnitude of PSA decline and inversely associated with baseline PSA. These effects remained after correcting for covariates. In all analyses, treatment with AA led to rPFS outcomes superior to P. Clinical trial information: NCT00887198.

Baseline PSA
(ng/mL)
by quartile
HRa for
progression
(95% CI)
P value % PSA
decline
HRb for
progression
(95% CI)
P value
1 < 16 0.49 (0.41, 0.57) < 0.001 No ↓ 1.00 (reference) -
2 16 - < 40 0.58 (0.46, 0.74) < 0.001 0 - < 50 0.75 (0.60, 0.93) 0.008
3 40 - < 106 0.75 (0.60, 0.94) 0.012 50 - < 90 0.40 (0.33, 0.50) < 0.0001
4 ≥ 106 1.00 (reference) - ≥ 90 0.22 (0.17, 0.28) < 0.0001

a vs ≥ 106; b vs no ↓

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2013 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Genitourinary (Prostate) Cancer

Track

Genitourinary Cancer

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00887198

Citation

J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl; abstr 5010)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.5010

Abstract #

5010

Poster Bd #

2

Abstract Disclosures