Factors predicting endoxifen levels in breast cancer patients taking standard-dose tamoxifen and following dose escalation.

Authors

null

Peter Fox

Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia

Peter Fox , Bo Gao , Bavanthi Balakrishnar , Alexander M Menzies , Shang Heng Yeap , Sayed Sahanawaz Ali , Val Gebski , Pamela Provan , Sally Coulter , Christopher Liddle , Rina Hui , Richard Kefford , Jodi Lynch , Nicholas Wilcken , Rosemary L Balleine , Howard Gurney

Organizations

Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia, Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, Melanoma Institute Australia, Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, Johns Hopkins Singapore International Medical Centre, Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, University of Sydney, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia, Westmead Millennium Institute, Sydney, Australia, Storr Liver Unit, Westmead Millennium Institute, University of Sydney, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia, Westmead Hospital and Melanoma Institute Australia, Westmead, Australia, St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia, Sydney West Cancer Network, Westmead Millennium Institute, Sydney Medical School-Westmead, Sydney, Australia

Research Funding

Other

Background: Tamoxifen (TAM) is transformed via CYP2D6 to its major active metabolite endoxifen (Endox). Recent data suggest that 15nM Endox may be a therapeutic threshold for breast cancer. This study identified predictors of achieving specified Endox target levels (15nM and 30nM) on standard dose TAM, and following dose escalation. Methods: Baseline Endox was measured in 122 breast cancer pts on TAM 20mg pd. Pts with baseline Endox <30nM underwent incremental dose escalation to a maximum of 60mg pd until Endox reached 30nM or dose limiting toxicity. Clinical data were collected and CYP2D6 genotype was used to specify extensive, intermediate or poor metabolizer categories (EM, IM, PM). Multiple regression analyses examined associations between Endox and potential predictive factors. Results: Baseline Endox ranged from 3.1-72.2nM (mean 27.6nM). In 19% (n=23), baseline Endox was below 15nM and 62% (n=76) were below 30nM. Low baseline Endox was associated with CYP2D6 genotype (IM or PM, p<0.001) and younger age (p=0.02). Following dose escalation, 96% (n=117) attained an Endox level of 15nM and 76% (n=93) reached 30nM. Baseline Endox level was the only variable independently associated with achieving both targets (p=0.02, p<0.001 respectively). CYP2D6 genotype did not independently predict attainment of Endox targets following dose escalation (p>0.4). The ratio of Endox to its precursor N-desmethylTAM, an indicator of CYP2D6 activity, was stable with dose escalation, suggesting that CYP2D6 was not saturated. Conclusions: Although IM/PM predict for low Endox on 20mg TAM, only low baseline Endox predicted failure to achieve both 15nM and 30nM targets following dose escalation. These results suggest a role for Endox level monitoring to determine optimal TAM dose. Clinical trial information: NCT01075802.

15 or 30nM Endox targets according to baseline Endox and CYP2D6 phenotype.
Baseline Endox (nM) n Mean baseline Endox (nM) Dose escalation
Mean maximum Endox (nM) % reached 15nM target % reached 30nM target
All patients 122 27.6 37.4 95.9 76.2
 0-10 12 6.6 16.8 66.7 0
 10-15 11 12.6 31.9 100 54.5
 15-20 21 18.0 39.0 - 94
 20-30 32 24.3 37.2 - 81.3
 >30 46 43.3 - - -
CYP2D6
 PM 17 12.3 22.9 76.5 23.5
 IM 37 23.2 36.7 100 78.4
 EM 68 33.8 41.5 98.5 88.2

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2013 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer - HER2/ER

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

ER+

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01075802

Citation

J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl; abstr 543)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.543

Abstract #

543

Poster Bd #

1F

Abstract Disclosures