Discordant ER, PR, and HER2 status between primary and metastatic breast cancer as prognostic factor.

Authors

null

Hee-Chul Shin

Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea

Hee-Chul Shin , Wonshik Han , Hyeong-Gon Moon , Seock-Ah Im , Woo Kyung Moon , In-Ae Park , Sung Jun Park , Dong Young Noh

Organizations

Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea, Cancer Research Institute and Department of Surgery, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea, Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea, Department of Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: The receptor status including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) of metastases may be different from that of the primary breast cancer. This discordance of receptor status may influence patient prognosis. We investigated discordance of receptor status between primary breast cancer and distant metastases in the same patients and its effect on prognosis. Methods: ER, PR, and HER2 status in metastases were available in 173 patients. The receptor status was compared between primary tumors and metastases. Tumors were classified as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) or non-triple-negative breast cancer (non-TNBC) according to receptor status and as concordant and discordant depending on the difference of receptor status between primary and metastatic breast cancer. Survival analysis was performed depending on concordant or discordant receptor status. Results: Discordance for ER, PR, and HER2 was 18.5%, 23.7%, and 10.4%, respectively. Concordant non-TNBC and TNBC between primary tumors and metastases was 69.9% and 17.9%, respectively. Discordant TNBC was 12.1%. On multivariate analysis, patients with discordant TNBC had unfavorable survival compared with patients with concordant non-TNBC (relative risk 2.544, 95% confidence interval, 1.220-5.303, p = 0.013). The median survival after recurrence was 41.8 months for patients with concordant non-TNBC, 20.7 months for patients with concordant TNBC, and 19.9 months for patients with discordant TNBC (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: The change of ER, PR, and HER2 status between primary and metastatic tumors occur and discordant TNBC is associated with poor survival.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2013 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer - Triple-Negative/Cytotoxics/Local Therapy

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl; abstr 1039)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.1039

Abstract #

1039

Poster Bd #

18F

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Outcomes of ER, PR, HER2, and triple-negative mutated breast cancer with brain metastasis.

First Author: Patrick Joseph O'Shea

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Evolution of HER2 scores after neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer.

First Author: Esther G Chong

Abstract

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Impact of HER2 low status on genomic signatures in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC).

First Author: Melissa Taylor