Overall survival results from a phase III study of tivozanib hydrochloride versus sorafenib in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Authors

null

Robert John Motzer

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Robert John Motzer , Timothy Eisen , Thomas E. Hutson , Cezary Szczylik , Mizue Krygowski , Andrew Louis Strahs , Brooke Esteves , Andrew P. Krivoshik , Anna Berkenblit , Dmitry Nosov

Organizations

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Cambridge University Health Partners, Cambridge, United Kingdom, Texas Oncology–Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, Military Institute of Health, Warsaw, Poland, AVEO Oncology, Cambridge, MA, Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc., Northbrook, IL, Department of Clinical Pharmacology & Chemotherapy, N.N. Blokhin Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Tivozanib hydrochloride (tivozanib) is a potent, selective, tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting all three vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, with a long half-life. Tivozanib has shown tolerability and superior progression-free survival and overall response rate versus sorafenib in a phase III trial (TIVO-1) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Final overall survival (OS) data (August 27, 2012) from TIVO-1 and its open-label, multicenter extension study are reported. Methods: A total of 517 patients were randomized 1:1 to tivozanib 1.5 mg/d (3 weeks on, 1 week off) or sorafenib 400 mg/d (twice a day, continuously) (J Clin Oncol2012;30[suppl]:Abstract 4501). In the extension study, patients who progressed (PD) on sorafenib based on investigator assessment were eligible to receive tivozanib, and patients with PD on tivozanib received subsequent treatment according to regional standards of care. Final OS analysis was planned to be conducted after all patients had died or were lost to follow-up, or when all patients in follow-up had been on study for at least 2 years, whichever occurred first. OS was compared using the stratified log-rank test. OS distribution was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratio (HR) was estimated using the Cox proportional hazard regression model. Results: At the time of final OS analysis (2 years after last patient was enrolled), 219 deaths had occurred (tivozanib, n=118 [45.4%]; sorafenib, n=101 [39.3%]) (stratified HR=1.245; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.954–1.624; p=0.105), trending in favor of the sorafenib arm. Median OS (95% CI) was 28.8 months (22.5–NA) for tivozanib and 29.3 months (29.3–NA) for sorafenib. Of the 257 patients on sorafenib, 155 (60.3%) had started next-line tivozanib at the time of the analysis. Conclusions: There was no significant difference in OS between the two treatment arms. The high rate of utilization of second-line tivozanib in patients following PD on sorafenib may have affected the OS outcome. Clinical trial information: NCT01030783.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2013 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session C: Renal Cancer

Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Sub Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01030783

Citation

J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl 6; abstr 350)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2013.31.6_suppl.350

Abstract #

350

Poster Bd #

B3

Abstract Disclosures