Axitinib with or without dose titration for first-line metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Unblinded results from a randomized phase II study.

Authors

Brian Rini

Brian I. Rini

Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH

Brian I. Rini , Viktor Gruenwald , Mayer N. Fishman , Bohuslav Melichar , Takeshi Ueda , A. H. Bair , Ying Chen , Paul W. Bycott , Dmitri Pavlov , Sinil Kim , Eric Jonasch

Organizations

Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, Palacky University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic, Division of Urology, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan, Pfizer Oncology, San Diego, CA, Pfizer Oncology, La Jolla, CA, Pfizer, Inc., New York, NY, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Patients receiving the 5-mg twice daily (BID) axitinib starting dose exhibit variable drug exposure; prior pharmacokinetic analyses indicate higher exposure is associated with better outcomes in mRCC. Dose titration based on individual tolerability may optimize exposure and improve efficacy. Methods: Patients (N=213) with treatment-naïve mRCC received axitinib 5 mg BID for a 4-week lead-in period. Then, patients with 2 consecutive weeks of blood pressure ≤150/90 mmHg, no axitinib-related toxicities >grade 2, no dose reductions, and ≤2 antihypertensive medications were randomized (double-blind) to axitinib 5 mg BID + dose titration to 10 mg BID maximum with axitinib or placebo. Those not eligible for randomization continued axitinib 5 mg BID or lower. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in randomized arms. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety were secondary endpoints. Assuming response rate under the null hypothesis is 0.15, this study had ≥80% power (1-sided type I error 10%) to detect a ≥25% absolute improvement in ORR with active vs placebo titration. Results: In all, 56 patients each were randomized to active and placebo titration arms, 91 were not randomized, and 10 withdrew during the lead-in period. As of Oct 12, 2012, ORR (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 54% (40–67) in the active titration arm vs 34% (22–48) in the placebo titration arm (1-sided P=0.019), and 59% (49–70) in the non-randomized arm. Median PFS (95% CI) from first dose was 14.5 mo (9.2–24.5) in the active titration arm vs 15.7 mo (8.3–19.4) in the placebo titration arm (hazard ratio favored active titration, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.54–1.35; 1-sided P=0.244), and 16.6 mo (11.2–22.5) in the non-randomized arm. Most frequent all-grade, all-causality adverse events in active titration, placebo titration, and non-randomized arms, respectively, were diarrhea (61% vs 63% vs 63%), hypertension (61% vs 43% vs 82%), and fatigue (45% vs 46% vs 54%). Conclusions: Axitinib is effective and well tolerated in first-line mRCC with prolonged median PFS in all treatment arms compared to historical controls. Axitinib dose titration significantly improved ORR vs placebo. Clinical trial information: NCT00835978.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2013 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session C: Renal Cancer

Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Sub Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00835978

Citation

J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl 6; abstr LBA349)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2013.31.6_suppl.lba349

Abstract #

LBA349

Poster Bd #

B2

Abstract Disclosures