Enzalutamide monotherapy: Phase II study results in patients with hormone-naive prostate cancer.

Authors

Bertrand Tombal

Bertrand Tombal

Université Catholique de Louvain, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium

Bertrand Tombal , Michael Borre , Per Rathenborg , Patrick Werbrouck , Axel Heidenreich , Peter Iversen , Edwina S. Baskin-Bey , Frank Perabo , De Phung , Matthew Raymond Smith

Organizations

Université Catholique de Louvain, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium, Department of Urology, Århus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark, AZ Groeninge Kortrijk, Kortrijk, Belgium, Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, North.-Rhine Westphalia, Germany, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, Astellas Pharma Europe, Ltd., Staines, United Kingdom, Astellas Pharma Inc., Leiderdorp, Netherlands, Astellas Pharma Europe BV, Leiderdorp, Netherlands, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Enzalutamide (ENZA) is an oral androgen receptor inhibitor that has been approved in the US and shown to increase overall survival by 4.8 months over a placebo (HR, 0.63) in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) previously treated with docetaxel (Scher et al, N Engl J Med 2012;367:1187). Compared with bicalutamide in nonclinical studies, enzalutamide had higher androgen receptor–binding affinity, prevented nuclear translocation, showed no DNA binding, and induced apoptosis (Tran et al, Science 2009;324:787). In contrast to previous phase II and III studies that exclusively enrolled patients with CRPC receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ie, testosterone (T) levels ≤50 ng/dL), this phase II study assessed the efficacy and safety of ENZA monotherapy in patients who had never received hormone therapy; presenting with non-castrate T levels (≥230 ng/dL). Methods: This was a 25-wk, open-label, single-arm study of patients with hormone-naïve, histologically confirmed prostate cancer (all stages) requiring hormonal treatment, an ECOG PS score of 0, and a life expectancy >1 y. All patients received ENZA 160 mg/d without concomitment castration. Primary endpoint was PSA response (>80% decrease at wk 25). Secondary endpoints included changes in endocrine levels and safety/tolerability. Results: Among 67 men enrolled, the median (range) age was 73 (48, 86) y; 39% had metastases; 36% and 24% had undergone prostatectomy or radiotherapy before study entry. The PSA response rate (>80% PSA decline at wk 25) was 93%, with a median (range) decrease of −99% (−100, −57) at wk 25. Serum T and estrogen levels increased by a median (range) of 113% (−32, 300) and 58% (−49, 321) at wk 25, respectively, compared with baseline. 82% of men reported drug-related AEs (mostly Grade 1 or 2). Most frequent treatment-emergent AEs included gynaecomastia (36%), fatigue (34%), and hot flush (18%). 7% of men experienced SAEs; none were drug-related. Conclusions: ENZA monotherapy (160 mg) was associated with significant PSA response in nearly all men with hormone-naïve prostate cancer. Endocrine level changes and most common AEs (gynecomastica, fatigue and hot flush) were consistent with potent AR inhibition. Clinical trial information: NCT01302041.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2013 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01302041

Citation

J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl 6; abstr 18)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2013.31.6_suppl.18

Abstract #

18

Poster Bd #

B9

Abstract Disclosures