Phosphorylated ERK (pERK) as biomarker in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with erlotinib within a randomized phase III trial (AIO-PK0104).

Authors

Stefan Boeck

Stefan Boeck

Department of Internal Medicine III and Comprehens

Stefan Boeck , Steffen Ormanns , Ruediger Laubender , Andreas Jung , Jens Siveke , Michael Haas , Jens Neumann , Ursula Vehling-Kaiser , Cornelia Winkelmann , Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal , Michael Clemens , Thomas Gauler , Angela Marten , Stefan Klein , Georgi Kojouharoff , Michael Geissler , Tim Greten , Thomas Kirchner , Volker Heinemann

Organizations

Department of Internal Medicine III and Comprehens, Department of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians Univer, Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Ep, Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum Recht, Practice for Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Luthe, Department of Oncology, Gesundheitszentrum St. Mar, Department of Internal Medicine I, Klinikum Mutter, Department of Medicine (Cancer Research), West Ger, Department of Surgery/National Center for Tumor Di, Department of Internal Medicine IV, Klinikum Bayre, Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Klini, Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and End

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Validated biomarkers for patients (pts) with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) treated with anti-EGFR drugs have not yet been defined. pERK represents the downstream target of the RAS-RAF-MEK cascade. Methods: Within AIO-PK0104 281 pts with APC were randomized between gemcitabine/erlotinib followed by capecitabine and capecitabine/erlotinib followed by gemcitabine. Archival formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue for central pERK analysis by immunohistochemistry (IHC) was available from 153 pts. Within a retrospective subgroup analysis, pERK data (either as dichotomous or continuous variable) were correlated with AIO-PK0104 biomarker results on KRAS mutation status and EGFR expression and with efficacy study endpoints using a Cox regression model. Results: A semi-quantitative immunohistochemistry scoring system considering cytoplasmic and nuclear pERK expression (staining intensity & % of positive cells) was developed (score 0-12). FFPE samples with a score of 6-12 were defined a pERKhigh. 98/153 pts were classified as pERKhigh and 55/153 pts as pERKlow, respectively. The median pERK score was 7 (range 0-12). No significant correlation of pERK with baseline characteristics like stage of disease, gender, age, KPS or CA 19-9 was detected. Median OS in pERKhigh pts was estimated with 5.7 months and with 6.2 months in pERKlow pts (HR 1.29, 95% CI 0.90-1.83, p=0.16). However, when analysing pERK as continuous variable, a significant association between the pERK score and OS was found (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.0-1.12, p [log rank]=0.050, p [likelihood ratio]=0.047), indicating an increase in the hazard for death by a factor of 1.06 for each score level of pERK expression. There was no correlation of pERK expression with the objective disease control rate (OR 0.99, p=0.91) or the occurrence of skin rash (OR 0.93, p=0.41). Pts with a KRAS mutation had a similar rate of pERKhigh expression compared to patients with KRAS wildtype (61% vs 71%, p=0.32). Conclusions: pERK expression may have an impact on OS of APC pts treated with the anti-EGFR agent erlotinib. Prospective validation of these results is recommended. Clinical trial information: NCT00440167.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2013 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session B: Cancers of the Pancreas, Small Bowel, and Hepatobiliary Tract

Track

Cancers of the Pancreas, Small Bowel, and Hepatobiliary Tract

Sub Track

Translational Research

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00440167

Citation

J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl 4; abstr189)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2013.31.4_suppl.189

Abstract #

189

Poster Bd #

A49

Abstract Disclosures