Characterization of the overall survival benefit in ENCORE 301, a randomized, placebo-controlled phase II study of exemestane with and without entinostat in ER+ postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors

null

Pamela Klein

PMK Consulting

Pamela Klein , William McCulloch , Peter Ordentlich , Scott Cruickshank , Miranda Rees , Denise Yardley

Organizations

PMK Consulting, Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Scott Cruickshank & Associates, Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Background: Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) prevent the emergence of drug tolerant clones and sensitize cells to a variety of anti-cancer therapies. We previously reported ENCORE 301, a randomized placebo controlled phase II study comparing exemestane with (EE) and without (EP) the HDACi entinostat met its primary endpoint of prolonging progression free survival (PFS) (4.3 months vs 2.3 months) and extending overall survival (OS) benefit (26.9 vs 19.8 months). In order to characterize and better understand the OS benefit, exploratory analyses were conducted. Methods: Hazard ratios (HR) for treatment were estimated from the Cox proportional hazards model, with EP serving as the reference treatment in the calculations. Inferential comparisons between treatment groups were made using the log-rank test. Results: Analysis of OS across multiple subsets of interest demonstrated a consistent benefit in EE group versus EP. Sensitivity analysis of baseline characteristics potentially impacting OS did not identify any factors that influenced the effect of EE on OS. Examination of treatments received during follow-up after discontinuation of EE and EP demonstrated balance between treatment group for patients receiving chemotherapy (48% EE: 44% EP), hormone therapy (37% EE: 35% EP), bisphosphonates (2% EE; 0% EP), radiation (6% EE; 5%EP), and surgery (0% EE: 2% EP). Compared to EP, OS was longer in EE group for patients whose first subsequent treatment was a hormone therapy (EE median not reached vs EP median 20.5 months; HR 0.65 [95% CI 0.26, 1.58]) or chemotherapy (EE median 26.9 months vs EP median 17.6 months; HR 0.51 [95% CI 0.25, 1.04]). Updated PFS and OS data will also be presented along with correlation analysis of PFS and OS. Conclusions: Analyses of baseline characteristics, subsequent treatment and subsets of prognostic factors in ENCORE 301 did not identify any contributing factors that account for the extended OS benefit in the EE treatment group. Long lasting effects of entinostat on progenitor cells, emergence of drug tolerant cells and or priming to subsequent therapies cannot be ruled out.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2012 Breast Cancer Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session C

Track

Survivorship and Health Policy,Systemic Therapy

Sub Track

Advanced Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00676663

Citation

J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl 27; abstr 128)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2012.30.27_suppl.128

Abstract #

128

Poster Bd #

C6

Abstract Disclosures