Do patient tracking, follow-up, and referral practices contribute to breast cancer disparities in a large urban area?

Authors

null

Christine B. Weldon

Center for Business Models in Healthcare, Chicago, IL

Christine B. Weldon , Julia R. Trosman , Danielle Dupuy , Betty Roggenkamp , Julian C. Schink , Jennifer M. Orsi , Anne Marie Murphy

Organizations

Center for Business Models in Healthcare, Chicago, IL, Chicago Breast Cancer Quality Consortium, Chicago, IL, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL

Research Funding

No funding sources reported
Background: Chicago Black women are 62% more likely to die from breast (BC) cancer than White women. Previous data from 39 Chicago hospitals suggested significant quality deficits in breast cancer screening and treatment (Chicago Breast Cancer Quality Consortium, 2010). Patient tracking, follow up and referral practices may influence quality of care for minority women (Mojica et al, Cancer Control, 2007). Our goal is to evaluate tracking, follow up and referral practices during screening, diagnosis and treatment of BC at Chicago hospitals servicing Black women. Methods: Using the framework approach of qualitative research, we conducted interviews with providers of BC screening and care from 20 Chicago institutions with Black patients averaging 50% of patient base (15 community, 3 academic and 2 public hospitals). Informants included surgeons, medical oncologists, radiologists, mammography technicians, internists, nurses, administrators, and patient navigators. Interviews were transcribed, and thematic and statistical analyses were performed (simple frequencies and Fisher's exact test). Results: Six of the 20 sites (30%) follow up with patients who did not show for a scheduled mammography visit. Five of these sites (83%, 5/6) have a low “no-show” rate (below 20%), compared to 4 sites (29%, 4/14) with low “no-show” rates among the 14 sites without follow-up (p=0.05). Seven of the 20 sites (25%) direct diagnosed patients to their next step in care by providing referrals and guidance, while other 13 sites rely on a primary care physician or leave the patient without a clear care plan. BC patients at 6 of the 7 sites directing care (83%, 5/6) are referred to a mid- or high-volume surgeon (3+ BC surgeries / month), compared to patients from only 1 of the 13 sites not directing care (p=0.001). Nine of the 20 sites track diagnosed BC patients through their care. Five of them (56%, 5/9) also track survivors, compared to none (0%, 0/11) of the 11 sites who do not track patients (p=0.008). Conclusions: Poor tracking, follow up and referral practices for breast cancer screening and treatment are associated with suboptimal care and may contribute to outcome disparities for Black women in Chicago.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2012 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Health Services Research

Track

Health Services Research

Sub Track

Access to Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl; abstr 6120)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.6120

Abstract #

6120

Poster Bd #

11E

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Demand for oncology visits among low-risk breast cancer survivors.

First Author: Emily H. Douglas

Abstract

2022 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Racial/ethnic disparities in patient care experiences among prostate cancer survivors: A SEER-CAHPS study.

First Author: Ambrish Pandit

First Author: Tamara Hamlish