Patients with carcinoma of unknown primary and “colon cancer profile”: Clinicopathologic features and survival data.

Authors

null

Gauri R. Varadhachary

University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Gauri R. Varadhachary , Siddharth Karanth , John D. Hainsworth , Huamin Wang , Heather R. Carlson , Renato Lenzi , James L. Abbruzzese , Martin N. Raber , Frank A. Greco

Organizations

University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN

Research Funding

No funding sources reported
Background: We have previously proposed a “colon cancer profile” (CCP-CUP) favorable subset. CCP-CUP is ~ 8% of all CUP with features resembling lower gastroinestional cancers. Distinguishing this entity from other CUP pts is of significance given the progress in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Additionally, emerging data suggests a high level of agreement between histology+IHC and tissue of origin profiling for CCP-CUP. Methods: The retrospective cohort includes 74 pts from MD Anderson (50) and Sarah Cannon (24) Cancer Centers from 2004 -2010. Pts with CDX2+ tumors and pathology suggesting a "GI profile" were chosen. All pts met the definition of CUP and most had a negative colonoscopy. Results: 2 cohorts were created - Cohort 1 (34 pts), labeled “consistent with lower GI profile” [CDX2+, CK20+, CK7-] and Cohort 2 (40 pts), labeled “probable lower GI profile” [CDX2+, irrespective of CK7/CK20 status]. Most pts had a good PS; 58% women, median age 59 yrs; 20 (27%) pts had ascites on presentation and the predominant sites of metastases included liver (30%), carcinomatosis (50%), and nodes (51%). 53 pts received first line CRC regimens (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI based), 15 pts received gemcitabine or taxane based and 3 ‘other’ regimens. OS was 37 mo (C.I 22- 52). 6 of these were "outliers" (Stage 4 NED or indolent pathology). Excluding these, cohorts 1 and 2 had 32 and 36 pts - their OS were 37 and 21 mo respectively. There was no difference in OS of pts with or without ascites on presentation. Kras data was available for 17; 12 were Kras mutant. On multivariate analysis, the factors found to negatively influence survival were age, PS (of 2) and 3 or more sites of disease. Conclusions: Survival of IHC defined CCP-CUP pts (which may include colorectal, appendiceal and small bowel profile) exceeds historical control and illustrates a new "favorable" subset. IHC is not without its limitations – nonetheless, pts with CDX2 + tumors and CUP should undergo evaluation for GI cancers and likely best served with an armamentarium of drugs used for CRC. Since carcinomatosis and liver mets are predominant sites, all patients with abdominal CUP should undergo optimal IHC (CDX-2, CK7, and CK20) testing to rule out a CCP-CUP.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2012 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Other GI Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl; abstr 4130)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.4130

Abstract #

4130

Poster Bd #

52A

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Lindsey Carlsen

First Author: Sandra Algarin Perneth

Abstract

2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Comprehensive genomic profiling of squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary presenting with liver metastases.

First Author: Hannah Ruth Robinson