Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing a Patient-Centered Oncology Care Model

Authors

null

Manasi A. Tirodkar

Discern Health, Baltimore, MD

Manasi A. Tirodkar, Lindsey Roth, Shelley Fuld Nasso, Mark W. Friedberg, Sarah H. Scholle

Preview

PURPOSE:

Oncology practices often serve as the “medical home” for patients but may not have systems to support all aspects of patient-centered care. We piloted a new set of oncology medical home standards that call for accessible, continuous, coordinated, and team-based care. We examined how adoption of the standards varies across a variety of practices and compared practice self-report with external evaluation of implementation.

METHODS:

Five medical oncology practices in southeastern Pennsylvania implemented the standards from 2014 into 2016. Implementation support included training webinars and technical assistance. External reviewers evaluated practices’ implementation of the standards. We conducted site visits to interview providers and patients.

RESULTS:

Between baseline and follow-up, practice self-assessments and independent audits showed practices increased implementation of the patient-centered oncology standards. The largest improvement was seen in continuous quality improvement (QI). Practices were less successful in implementing care coordination: achievement on two standards (access and evidence-based decision support) declined from baseline to follow-up. Qualitative analyses revealed that practices focused QI in five areas: goals of care, engaging patients in QI, financial counseling, symptom management, and care coordination. Interviewees talked about facilitators, such as leadership support and physician buy-in, and barriers to transformation, including inadequate resources and staffing. Health information technology both supported and limited implementation.

CONCLUSION:

Oncology practices showed some progress in their implementation of patient-centered care processes over the course of the pilot program. Systems for tracking and documenting improvement, training for staff and clinicians, leadership support, and alignment of financial incentives are critical to transformation.

View Full Journal Article

Journal Details

DOI

10.1200/OP.20.00231

Published Date

September 30, 2020

Similar Journals

Journal

JCO Oncology Practice

Power of an Effective Clinical Conversation: Improving Accrual Onto Clinical Trials

First Author: Linda K. Parreco

Publish Date: Mar 27, 2012

Journal

JCO Oncology Practice

Effective Staff Management

Publish Date: Nov 1, 2008

Journal

JCO Oncology Practice

Future Supply of and Demand for Oncologists

Publish Date: Nov 1, 2008

Journal

JCO Oncology Practice

Deciding About Practice Options

Publish Date: Jul 1, 2006