Introducing a multidisciplinary approach to medication optimization for geriatric oncology inpatients.

Authors

null

Caitriona Goggin

University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland

Caitriona Goggin, Darren J. Walsh, Emer Cronin, Emily Dunne, Michelle Hannan, Carol Buckley, Anne Horgan

Organizations

University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: Drug-related complications have been associated with adverse outcomes in older adults with cancer. This pilot interventional study aimed to assess the feasibility of introducing an inpatient multidisciplinary (MDT) comprehensive medication assessment focussing on the specific needs of older adults with cancer, in addition to standard hospital medication review and reconciliation. Methods: Patients≥70 years with a solid tumour diagnosis, admitted under the medical oncology service, were discussed at a weekly MDT meeting involving geriatric oncology physicians, nurses and pharmacists. Relevant data including age, cancer type and stage, Rockwood clinical frailty scale, comorbidities, medications on admission and initiated during hospitalisation, systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT), falls history, cognitive screening, and laboratory parameters were prospectively collected. An MDT medication review was conducted including SACT toxicity assessment, drug-drug interactions (DDI), potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) assessment using STOPP/START criteria, and anticholinergic burden (ACB) scoring. A summary of medication review findings and recommendations was provided to the primary inpatient team to support medication optimisation. Results: Sixty patients were included over a 4 month period, with a median age of 76.5 years (range 65-88). Most patients had lung cancer (36.7%), 80% had stage IV disease. Twenty-five patients (42%) were moderately or severely frail. Most patients (61.7%) were on systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT). Seven patients (11.7%) had a fall in the previous 3 months and 15 patients (25%) experienced acute confusion during the hospitalisation. ADEs were identified in 26 patients (43%), PIMs in 33 (55%), excessive ACB in 43 (72%) and DDIs in 53 (88%). MDT medication optimisation recommendations were made in 59 patients (98%) in addition to standard of care review. Based on review findings, medication interventions included recommendations to deprescribe, start drug, amend drug dose, route or frequency, perform additional laboratory monitoring, and SACT-specific recommendations (Table 1). Conclusions: Implementing an interprofessional geriatric oncology MDT approach to medication review in hospitalised older adults with cancer can result in additional medication recommendations alongside standard of care.

Summary of medication optimisation recommendations following MDT review.

Medication Intervention RecommendationsPatients
n = 60
Total Recommendations
Total59 (98%)183 (mean 3.05, range 0-8)
Stop drug32 (53%)41
Start drug21 (35%)25
Amend dose21 (35%)23
Amend frequency/timing11 (18%)12
Laboratory monitoring32 (53%)41
General recommendations, e.g. falls prevention19 (32%)22
SACT recommendations4 (7%)4

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A

Track

Quality, Safety, and Implementation Science,Cost, Value, and Policy,Patient Experience,Survivorship

Sub Track

Quality Improvement Research and Implementation Science

Citation

JCO Oncol Pract 19, 2023 (suppl 11; abstr 455)

DOI

10.1200/OP.2023.19.11_suppl.455

Abstract #

455

Poster Bd #

K13

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts