TRANSFORMER: Bipolar androgen therapy (BAT) versus enzalutamide (E) for castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer (mCRPC).

Authors

null

Samuel R. Denmeade

Johns Hopkins University Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD

Samuel R. Denmeade , Hao Wang , Harry Cao , Wei Fu , Ting Wang , Rehab Abdallah , Vanessa Bolejack , Neeraj Agarwal , David C. Smith , Michael Thomas Schweizer , Mark N. Stein , Vasily J. Assikis , Thomas W. Flaig , Russell Zelig Szmulewitz , Jeffrey Holzbeierlein , Channing Judith Paller , Michael Anthony Carducci , Mark Christopher Markowski , Mario A. Eisenberger , Emmanuel S. Antonarakis

Organizations

Johns Hopkins University Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, Cancer Research and Biostatistics, Seattle, WA, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, University of Washington/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, Peachtree Hem Onc Consult, Atlanta, GA, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

Research Funding

Other Government Agency
Department of Defense Prostate Cancer Research Program

Background: Rapid cycling between high and low testosterone (T) (i.e BAT) produces tumor response in mCRPC, and may overcome resistance to newer AR therapies. Here we report a randomized study comparing BAT to E in men with mCRPC progressing on abiraterone (A). Methods: In this phase 2 trial, men received either T cypionate 400mg IM (BAT) once every 28 days or daily oral E 160mg. Primary endpoint was clinical/radiographic PFS; crossover was permitted at progression. Secondary endpoints were OS, PSA progression to primary and crossover therapy, PSA and objective responses (OR), time to PSA progression from randomization through crossover (PFS2), quality of life (QoL), and AEs. Results: 195 men were randomized (94 to BAT, 101 to E). Results are presented in table. Although diametrically opposed therapies, median PFS and PSA response in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population was not significantly different between BAT and E. OR and OS favored BAT. For those who received BAT and then crossed over to E the PSA50 response was 77.8% and time to PSA progression was 10.9 mo compared to 25.3% and 3.8 mo for those receiving E immediately after A. The sequence of treatment had a significant effect on median PSF2 which was 28.2 mo for men receiving BAT→E vs. 19.6 m for E→BAT. For men who crossed over from BAT to E, OS was 37.3 mo vs. 28.6 months for those receiving E without crossover. AEs were primarily grade 1-2 in the BAT arm and included fatigue, generalized pain, and lower extremity edema. BAT improved QoL (fatigue, physical functioning, sexual function) vs. E. Conclusions: BAT could be safely administered to asymptomatic men with mCRPC. BAT produced a comparable PFS to E in A-refractory mCRPC pts. However, PSA50 and OR after crossover, as well as PFS2, were significantly improved in men who received BAT→E versus E→BAT. OS in men receiving BAT→E was 37.3 mo, exceeding historical expectations. These results support the hypothesis that treatment with BAT is safe, has efficacy and can restore sensitivity to antiandrogens. Clinical trial information: NCT02286921.

Prespecified end points (ITT population).

InitialN =BATN =EHRP Value
Time to clin/radio prog-mo945.71015.71.140.42
Time to PSA prog.- mo912.8983.81.510.02
PSA50-no. (%)8523 (27.1)9123 (25.3)0.70
OR- no. (%)338 (24.2)241 (4.2)0.07
OS-mo9432.910129.00.930.74
CrossoverBAT to EE to BAT
OS (BAT-Enza vs Enza-BAT)-mo3437.34630.20.630.17
OS (BAT-Enza vs Enza only)-mo3437.35528.60.500.03
Time to PSA prog.- mo3610.8471.10.260.0001
PSA50-no. (%)3628 (77.8)4711 (23.4)
OR- no. (%)3510 (28.6)413 (7.3)0.03
PFS2-mo9428.210119.60.440.02

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Genitourinary Cancer—Prostate, Testicular, and Penile

Track

Genitourinary Cancer—Prostate, Testicular, and Penile

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer - Advanced Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02286921

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 5517)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.5517

Abstract #

5517

Poster Bd #

98

Abstract Disclosures