Cost-effectiveness of filgrastim-sndz as primary prophylaxis (PP) versus secondary prophylaxis (SP) to prevent chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients at intermediate risk.

Authors

Edward Li

Edward C. Li

Sandoz, Princeton, NJ

Edward C. Li , Dylan Mezzio , Andrew Spargo , Kimberley J. Campbell , Gary H. Lyman

Organizations

Sandoz, Princeton, NJ, Xcenda, Palm Harbor, FL, Sandoz Inc, Princeton, NJ, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA

Research Funding

Other
Sandoz, Inc.

Background: Patients with nonmetastatic NSCLC receiving platinum-based chemotherapy are at an intermediate risk (10-20%) of developing FN; clinical practice guidelines recommend assessing whether these patients have FN risk factors before considering myeloid growth factor (MGF) prophylaxis. Most NSCLC patients receiving chemotherapy have ≥1 FN risk factors, and while PP leads to lower rates of FN across all cycles, it is more costly compared to SP. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of PP vs. SP using a biosimilar MGF, filgrastim-sndz, in NSCLC patients at intermediate risk of FN. Methods: A Markov model with a lifetime horizon was constructed to evaluate the total costs and clinical outcomes of using filgrastim-sndz as PP vs. SP in NSCLC patients 61 years old receiving adjuvant carboplatin/paclitaxel every 3 weeks for 4 cycles. Separate analyses were conducted for patients with 0 FN risk factors (0RF) and with ≥1 FN risk factors (1+RF), representing 11.3% and 18% baseline FN risk, respectively. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for cost per FN event avoided, life-year saved (LYS), and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained from a United States payer perspective. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were conducted. Results: For patients with 0RF, use of filgrastim-sndz as PP vs. SP provided an additional 0.056 QALYs (0.079 LYS) at an incremental cost of $3,266. The ICERs were $46,815, $41,555, and $58,531 for cost per FN event avoided, cost per LYS, and cost per QALY gained, respectively. For patients with 1+RF, PP vs. SP added 0.090 QALYs (0.127 LYS) at an incremental cost of $1,605. The ICERs were $13,970, $12,644, and $17,805 for cost per FN event avoided, cost per LYS, and cost per QALY gained, respectively. In the PSA, the likelihood of cost-effectiveness at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $50,000 per QALY gained was 31.7% for patients with 0RF and 96.6% for 1+RF. Conclusions: For NSCLC patients at intermediate risk of FN receiving adjuvant carboplatin/paclitaxel with 1+RF, PP with filgrastim-sndz compared to SP is cost-effective based on a WTP threshold of $50,000/QALY.

PP (comparator) vs. SP (reference) using filgrastim-sndz.

FN Risk Factors∆ Costs∆ FNs Avoided∆ LYs∆ QALYsIncremental $/FN Event AvoidedIncremental $/LYSIncremental $/QALY Gained
0$3,2660.0700.0790.056$46,815$41,555$58,531
≥1$1,6050.1150.1270.090$13,970$12,644$17,805

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Health Services Research and Quality Improvement

Track

Quality Care/Health Services Research

Sub Track

Value/Cost of Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr e19401)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.e19401

Abstract #

e19401

Abstract Disclosures