Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the randomized, phase III IMpower150 study of atezolizumab (atezo) + chemotherapy (chemo) ± bevacizumab (bev) vs chemo + bev in 1L nonsquamous metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC).

Authors

Martin Reck

Martin Reck

LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, German Center for Lung Research, Grosshansdorf, Germany

Martin Reck , Tom Karagiannis , Thomas Wehler , Mikhail Shtivelband , Jose-Luis Gonzalez-Larriba , Jeffrey Rothenstein , Martin Frueh , Yu Deng , Ariel Lopez-Chavez , Alan Sandler , Mark A. Socinski

Organizations

LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, German Center for Lung Research, Grosshansdorf, Germany, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany, Ironwood Cancer and Research Centers, Chandler, AZ, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain, Durham Regional Cancer Center, Lakeridge Health, Oshawa, ON, Canada, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland, Florida Hospital Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Atezo (anti–PD-L1) + bev (anti-VEGF) + chemo prolonged PFS vs bev + chemo in patients (pts) with 1L nonsquamous mNSCLC in the randomized, Phase III IMpower150 study. PRO data, including symptom burden, functioning and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), were evaluated to assess overall clinical benefit in each treatment (Tx) arm. Methods: Pts received atezo 1200 mg + carboplatin (C) AUC 6 + paclitaxel (P) 200 mg/m2 (Arm A) or atezo + bev 15 mg/kg + C + P (Arm B) vs bev + C + P (Arm C) IV q3w for 4 or 6 cycles per investigator decision, then maintenance atezo, atezo + bev, or bev, respectively. PRO data were collected using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 questionnaires. Prespecified analyses included the mean change from baseline in symptoms, functioning and HRQoL and time to deterioration (TTD) in lung cancer symptoms. Clinically meaningful change was defined as a ≥10-point change in score from baseline. Results: PRO completion rates were high (≥70% through cycle 23 for all arms). Mean changes from baseline indicated that a clinically meaningful worsening (≥10-point change) was not observed in any arm through cycle 13 (≈25% of pts remain in Arm C); HRQoL and physical functioning scores minimally decreased (Arm A: −2.83 and −3.39; Arm B: −1.8 and −3.98; Arm C: −1.92 and −2.6) with concurrent numerical worsening in Tx-related symptom scores (e.g., fatigue, constipation, nausea/vomiting). Following chemo completion, scores returned to baseline or numerically improved. HRQoL, physical functioning and Tx-related symptoms were comparable between Arms B and C. No difference was observed between arms in the TTD in lung cancer symptoms assessed. All arms reported numerical improvement in multiple lung cancer symptoms while on Tx. Conclusions: These data suggest that prolonged PFS in Arm B was achieved without compromising HRQoL or physical functioning despite higher Tx-related AEs than Arm C. PRO data reflected a minimal Tx burden across arms, further reduced following chemo discontinuation. Overall, PRO data support the positive benefit:risk of the clinical data with atezo + bev + chemo in 1L nonsquamous mNSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT02366143

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Lung Cancer—Non-Small Cell Metastatic

Track

Lung Cancer

Sub Track

Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02366143

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 9047)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.9047

Abstract #

9047

Poster Bd #

370

Abstract Disclosures